User talk:MReichel

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 20:00, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 20:04, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 21:29, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Neutral point of view and WP:COI are two good places to start. Given that you are his attorney, it's highly inappropriate for you to be editing the article at all. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 21:50, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * As reviewing admin, I Imade a comment on the question at issue at User talk:98.248.32.178 -- he is basically correct, as I have explained there. DGG (talk) 05:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark J. Reichel
A tag has been placed on Mark J. Reichel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste: talk 20:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Following your comment on the talk page of your article their are two associated points to make. Firstly, the article does not assert adequate encyclopedic notability. (Would you expect to see it in the Encyclopedia Britannica?) Secondly, it is autobiographical; we make the assumption here that anyone who merits an article will find it has been written by someone else. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 21:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)