User talk:MS47

September 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I'm not sure why you changed the list of countries when there was a note immediately following saying the list shouldn't be changed? DonIago (talk) 16:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Proposed deletion of RIN (rapper)


The article RIN (rapper) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. buidhe 17:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

RIN (rapper) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, RIN (rapper), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  19:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kendal Brenneman


A tag has been placed on Kendal Brenneman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Nora Fingscheidt moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Nora Fingscheidt, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 17:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The NeverEnding Story III, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Infobox timestamps
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the club-update or pcupdate parameter for club stats, or the nationalteam-update or ntupdate parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes, or for MDY dates, use mdytime. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 14:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Change from Austrian-American to Austrian-born on Hedy Lamarr
You may not have known this, but your change from Austrian-American to Austrian-born on Hedy Lamarr was counter to the consensus at Talk:Hedy Lamarr. I reverted your edit for this reason. Peaceray (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Don't Look Now, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 21:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:RIN (rapper)


Hello, Donald Duck34. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RIN".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Rebecca
Hi! I was the one who reverted your edit on Rebecca (2020 film). It is not really relevant to this film that we mention that there is another film based on the same source material. It would be different if this film was using the other film as an inspiration or a basis point, but unless we provide citation, we are drawing connections that aren't there. That is getting into original research territory. For example, Gnomeo & Juliet does not mention the 1968 film Romeo and Juliet, even though they have the same source material. BOVINEBOY 2008 16:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it would be good if the 1940 version would be mentioned in the 2020s version article. Maybe not at the top of the article, but it is relevant information. --Donald Duck34 (talk) 16:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Could I ask why you think it is relevant? Maybe a good compromise would be to add a "See also" section? BOVINEBOY 2008 16:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah i think that would be okay. --Donald Duck34 (talk) 16:12, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vertigo (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 10:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

WP:FILMLEAD
Please review WP:FILMLEAD. We generally do not make statements such as "X is an American-German film", because they are ambiguous. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 19:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Vertigo (film). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. ''You have been warned previously about this. Please stop now. Thank you.'' David J Johnson (talk) 11:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lizabeth Scott, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding unnecessary, unwarranted, unverified political party affiliations to the pages of actors and actresses. Drmies (talk) 22:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Reminder. Same pattern in deWP. --Roger (talk) 08:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm Vacant0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Left Party (Sweden), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 15:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

April 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shadow of a Doubt, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Shadow of a Doubt, you may be blocked from editing. It's hard to believe you're editing in good faith when your most recent warning, earlier this year, was regarding this exact article. DonIago (talk) 14:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)


 * You have not responded to repeated warnings and you continue to change film genres without either discussion or edit summary. This amounts to disruptive editing and administrators will be advised to block your account. Sweetpool50 (talk) 22:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)