User talk:MSMRHurricane/Archive 7

Neutral notice
This is a neutral notice to all registered editors at RuPaul's Drag Race and Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race this year (2017) that an RfC on sourcing and citing has begun at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Coach
Could you please stop creating confusion in Coach's role in Season 3. Have you seen all the eps to S3? He is still credited as a special guest according to the end credits. I am asking you this one time to please refrain yourself from the characters section. 107.77.216.128 (talk) 16:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes I have, and regardless of him being credited as special guest, he appears in over 3 episodes, therefore we list him as recurring, that's how it goes on every other television show article. If he appeared in one or two episodes, we would list him as special guest - like for season 5 & 6 - but he appeared in multiple episodes that season, so that's not the case. And please don't threaten me with your baseless accusations, you are in the wrong, so please refrain yourself from disrupting the page before I report you. Thank you. MSMRHurricane (talk) 02:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Copyright concerns
Are you aware of the questions that have been raised about some of your edits? --John (talk) 00:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi there, yes I am. But I really don't think I have violated anything, especially at this point. I re-edited the summaries twice to avoid copyright violations but apparently the user that has reported me still claims they violate to the extreme. So honestly, I can't deal with a user that is like that. I have even gone to a few other users, one who has been editing the page with me for about a year or so, and they even agreed that they didn't see any violations on the page. So what can I do exactly? I don't respond to stubborn, bully-type editors on here. Sorry. However, what is going to be done now? MSMRHurricane (talk) 03:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I took a look. On a random sample, this edit for example added material which seems to be a copyright violation from here. Would you agree? I also see that edits like this one, while well-intentioned, are not enough to meet our policy requirements. Changing a few words around isn't enough; you must actually write in your own words. Finally, edits like this which involve edit-warring to restore material which was correctly removed as a violation, put you into a whole new category of wrong. Now, as to your question, what happens next is either you acknowledge that you can't make edits like those, or you don't. If it's the former I can maybe help you and coach you if you need help. If it's the latter, we'd have to look at a block. What do you think? --John (talk) 08:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I appreciate that you have clarified this for me. Honestly, I thought my edits were complying with the rules, therefore I was not intentionally trying to violate Wikipedia rules. The user that has accused me never gave me a clear example of what I was violating. Anyhow, appreciate the clarification and now I will refrain from doing the same mistakes again. Thank you. MSMRHurricane (talk) 18:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem. Let me know if I can ever help you in any way. I'll mark this as closed. --John (talk) 19:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

The Walking Dead
For the last time, all the characters I changed there in the table have only had 2 or less appearance. You said that the characters are displayed as recurring, if the more than 3 appearances. Now, please tell me where the logic is? Merle has appeared in Season 1 2 appearances and is being viewed as a guest, and many side roles are also displayed as recurring! Either ALL CHARACTERS are displayed as RECURRING which have more than 2 appearances or as GUEST. And you do not need to report your threats because of me. I'm doing the right thing all the time, but YOU DO NOT WANT TO UNDERSTAND IT! In addition, only characters are considered as Recurring in the table. Then many characters should be removed, because they are a guest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKerberos01 (talk • contribs) 05:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I cannot see your point within this message. I have clearly stated to you on numerous occasions, that only recurring characters are to be displayed in the recurring table. You have changed some characters who were not recurring, and who were guests, and then I removed them from the table as their only appearances on the show/seasons are deemed as guest (2 or less appearances). What don't you understand? You changed it, yet they did not belong in the recurring table since they were not recurring, but guests. Merle is guest in the first two seasons, but he is apart of the main cast in the main cast table, therefore he is rightfully displayed in the correct place, seeing as he was a main cast member at some point, and we must display his previous appearances - that were three appearances over two seasons - just like everyone else on the main and recurring cast tables. With characters who have been guests and then recurring, or vice versa, they are eligible to stay on the recurring table since they were or eventually became recurring characters. So, what can't you understand? I understand your reasons, yet they don't comply with the table and you are blatantly ignoring my reasons. I am warning you that I will report if you do not stop reverting my edits and disrupting the page, since you are displaying information in the wrong place, and I have told you why they don't fit in those places numerous times, yet you keep reverting my edits instead of asking me for my reasons, which is what I'm providing you now. MSMRHurricane (talk) 08:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Sous-chefs for Hell's Kitchen Season 17.
This is a video from the official Hell's Kitchen YouTube channel. Chef Ramsay is introducing the 2 sous-chefs. - (101.98.104.241 (talk) 02:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC))


 * Thank you for providing this source for me, I will put it on the page. MSMRHurricane (talk) 05:42, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

This Is Us
I'm not gonna leave you a warning or anything you seem like you've been here for a while and you seem like you know what you're doing but just for future reference per WP:TVUPCOMING it states that "However, years should not be added to said section heading until an episode actually airs in that calendar year.". So 2017 was added as soon as episode 1 of season 2 aired but 2018 will not be added until an episode actually airs anytime after January 1st 2018. TheDoctorWho (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh right, my bad. I was under the impression that the years should not be added until the season has aired entirely. Thanks for letting me know though! MSMRHurricane (talk) 02:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

LOST: Claire (Emily de Ravin) in season 5.
If you watched the series, you should remember she is in the 4th episode of season 5. When Sawyer is traveling through time on the island, he can see Clair and Kate when Aaron is being delivered. I know it's a flashback, but her character and Emily herself appears in that single episode. You can rewatch the episode so you can verity it, or look at this: http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Character_appearances

Here is the scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_UFRAz-4LE

Wednom (talk) 07:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)


 * That was archival footage, the table isn't purely based on the characters themselves - as they are fictional - the table is based on the actors credentials. Therefore, Emilie de Ravin was not credited in that episode as she did not appear in new footage. Please refer to her IMDB page as that particular episode is not listed among her work. Thank you. MSMRHurricane (talk) 20:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC).


 * It's part archive footage, and part not. The shots from behind Claire (What Sawyers is seeing) is not shown in a previous episodes. That scene was shot again. Actually, we can see that Emily's hair is different, since she wore a wig since season 4 until the end (she had shorter hair in reality then). Also the light is different. She's just sitting there, but she's still there. Wednom (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Most likely a stand-in was used for Claire, if re-shoots needed to be done. I've watched the show many times, and I have recently revised that particular episode and de Ravin was not credited at all, therefore she was not in the season, apart from the archival footage and stand-in, which don't qualify - in this case - to be displayed on the character table. MSMRHurricane (talk) 04:07, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

MTV Floribama Shore location
Do you know the exact location of the house? I'm flying to Florida soon and staying a few buildings away. I read that it was filmed on a certain short street. I started a thread on the show's talk page. I'd love to get some pics and upload to the article while I'm there. Thank you.  Royal broil  05:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars 3
There is currently a discussion going on over at the | RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars 3 talk page that you may be interested in participating in. Brocicle (talk) 06:52, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Reverting
When reverting and providing snarky edit summaries as you did, make sure you actually look at the edit you are attempting to revert. If you look, had nothing to do with what your edit summary speaks to. Nihlus 03:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * How was my summary snarky? You claim to have sources to support your edit, yet you didn't provide anything. In regards to my revert, like I said, Shangela and Thorgy both received positive and negative critiques, therefore it's more accurate - at this moment in time - to put them as safe, with the cornsilk tint and the note indicating they were ultimately safe after the judges mixed critique. As for your accusations of me reverting the wrong edits, please look over those two links you provided, as my "snarky" summary does relate to the right revert - your edits of Shangela and Thorgy being 'HIGH' and not 'SAFE' with the cornsilk tint. While the second link shows you reverting another user's disruptive edits - which I agree with you. The two don't relate to each other, so why try to make something out of noting? Thank you. MSMRHurricane (talk) 07:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

TOTAL DIVAS
CAN I TALK YOU ABOUT TOTAL DIVAS? Realnessperiod (talk) 19:59, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure. MSMRHurricane (talk) 02:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * CAN I HELP?
 * It's a public page, anyone can contribute. However, the edits must be correct, either supported by references or plan facts (episode already aired, etc.). MSMRHurricane (talk) 07:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It's my time to initiate this to ask something, has maryse and Alexa bliss confirmed for season 8? CK (talk) 09:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)