User talk:MSMediaHasBeenBought

Welcome!
Hello, MSMediaHasBeenBought, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

November 2020
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

My selected name does none of the banned things that are listed in your policy. Not one. I am a concerned citizen who is distraught over the libertine policies being displayed by this countries mainstream media outlets, especially with regard to narratives around politics, elections and the President of the United States. Certainly my text addition describing what are publicly displayed narratives is in no way more derogatory than the definition it was appended to, which claimed Daily Wire was sometimes referred to as fake-news. That text has now been removed along with my addition to it. But since you claim that I have been cancelled because of my username, it is very clear to me that you are mistaken. It is patently NOT “ profane” does not “threatens”, nor does it “attacks or impersonates another person” no other person is even mentioned”. It merely displays my intention to encorage dialog around deceptions promulgated by media which might be at cross purposes with it’s audience (which has been going on for time and memorial - and which is important for engaged citizens to understand.  That aspect of the name in no way “suggests that [I] do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia”. To the contrary it is my intention to raise due skepticism as a prophylactic to complacency so that this country can fulfill is great democratic promise, which I believe is being threatened.  Please restore my falsely-accused account immediately. MSMediaHasBeenBought (talk) 22:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The mainstream media are all about sensual pleasures in regard to politics, etc? We hear a lot of weird things, but that takes the cake. Just in case you ever get around to a proper block appeal, what you wrote was "Unfortunately the main stream media’s shameless pushing of incessant false narratives in the interests of Corporate and Big Tech entities, at the behest of their Democratic partners, has contributed to the rise of alternative news sites. The blatant omissions of news, facts, and events that are in conflict with their narratives, especially surrounding the 2020 election, has forced many Americans into the alternative news sites in search of information they cannot find elsewhere. In this way The Daily Wire and it’s peer news sources are essential to the upholding of America’s democratic values in the face of the oligarchic threat posed by big tech." Since Wikipedia is a mainstream encyclopedia, you clearly aren't here to contribute positively. Doug Weller  talk 11:07, 14 November 2020 (UTC)