User talk:MSTinPA

January 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Red Sector A has been reverted. Your edit here to Red Sector A was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzXDi_f9PUY&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR0Jtv9xfEdTrXUItaef0IhYtLTldeLkBrc3a_yxeCMGUzAXlxPnjjLI97M) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aspiration, Inc.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:27, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * The Complaints section I added is preceded by a section called Recognition. Are only positive comments of this bank allowed on Wikipedia? I didn't disparage the bank directly and linked three sources that support the statement. MSTinPA (talk) 17:51, 5 April 2019 (UTC) re
 * Thank you for reviewing my edit; reading guidelines further, my edit definitely violates COI editing; however, this is a problem with this bank. An independent review of this growing problem is needed to make this entry about Aspiration more than just a corporate advertisement for this business. MSTinPA (talk) 17:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The thing is that content, and especially negative content, needs to be verified by reliable secondary sources. I am not trying to make Wikipedia into an advertising platform, but this is something that needs better sourcing and neutral writing. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2019 (UTC)