User talk:MSquaredPR

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Marcoux (October 15)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  T K K ! bark with me if you're my dog!  15:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Sage Metering was accepted
 Sage Metering, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! FairyTailRocks (talk) 03:21, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=584632417 your edit] to Alex Marcoux may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * more to life than what can be proven in the labs.” {{cite book|last=Marcoux|first=Alex|title= {{red|&#41;}} . Lifesigns: Tapping the Power of Synchronicity, Serendipity and Miracles|year=2012|publisher=
 * {{red|&#91;&#91;}} Category:

August 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "MSquaredPR", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to represent an organisation rather than an individual. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. noq (talk) 09:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 15:59, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

I am interested in changing my name and submitted a request last month. Apparently whatever I did didn't work. did

Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Kuru  (talk)  00:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

This was my first article; I apologize if it appears I have not complied with the rules. I am certainly interested in correcting the problem.

In the creation of the “Alex Marcoux” page, there was no money exchanged. I am an associate of Alex Marcoux. My work is completely independent of Ms. Marcoux’s and in no way do I personally or professionally benefit from Ms. Marcoux’s public standing, so I do not see the conflict of interests.

Every fact laid out in the biography I wrote is verifiable and in no way embellished. Since this was my first attempt at using Wikipedia, I took great pains to tailor the article after other published author pages. I fully understand Wikipedia is a well-respected online encyclopedia and not a business directory. I chose to add Ms. Marcoux’s biography to Wikipedia because her accomplishments are noteworthy and interesting. She is the author of three novels and one non-fiction book, and has had her work published by four different publishers. The non-fiction book is currently being translated into Korean and will be released in Korea in May of 2015 by another publisher. Ms. Marcoux is a former scientist, credited with being instrumental in the development of Crystal Light for General Foods. She also testified to a Congressional committee about her previous employment at a tobacco company. Ms. Marcoux has since used her scientific discipline to create a unique nonfiction book. I certainly appreciate the difficulty of your job. If the article is not in compliance with Wikipedia guidelines, it is unintentional and I am interested in fixing the problem(s).

As far as the user name, I intentionally chose to use my business name in an effort to be transparent and not hide behind meaningless initials or an unrecognizable moniker. I am happy to change the user account name to something that does not appear to be promotional.

I hope my explanation has helped shed some light on the intention behind my creation of the page in question.

MSquaredPR (talk) 20:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Alex Marcoux for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Marcoux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alex Marcoux until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 02:53, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

I am not sure if it is appropriate to mention this here I have placed a response regarding my user name and why I felt Ms. Marcoux is a noteworthy. I have copied portions of my response here, also.

This was my first article; I apologize if it appears I have not complied with the rules. I am certainly interested in correcting the problem.

In the creation of the “Alex Marcoux” page, there was no money exchanged. I am an associate of Alex Marcoux. My work is completely independent of Ms. Marcoux’s and in no way do I personally or professionally benefit from Ms. Marcoux’s public standing, so I do not see the conflict of interests.

Every fact laid out in the biography I wrote is verifiable and in no way embellished. Since this was my first attempt at using Wikipedia, I took great pains to tailor the article after other published author pages.

I fully understand Wikipedia is a well-respected online encyclopedia and not a business directory. I chose to add Ms. Marcoux’s biography to Wikipedia because her accomplishments are noteworthy and interesting. She is the author of three novels and one non-fiction book, and has had her work published by four different publishers. The non-fiction book is currently being translated into Korean and will be released in Korea in May of 2015 by another publisher. Ms. Marcoux is a former scientist, credited with being instrumental in the development of Crystal Light for General Foods. She also testified to a Congressional committee about her previous employment at a tobacco company. Ms. Marcoux has since used her scientific discipline to create a unique nonfiction book.

I certainly appreciate the difficulty of your job. If the article is not in compliance with Wikipedia guidelines, it is unintentional and I am interested in fixing the problem(s).

As far as the user name, I intentionally chose to use my business name in an effort to be transparent and not hide behind meaningless initials or an unrecognizable moniker. I am happy to change the user account name to something that does not appear to be promotional.

I hope my explanation has helped shed some light on the intention behind my creation of the page in question.

MSquaredPR (talk) 20:59, 16 September 2014 (UTC)