User talk:MTDinoHunter

Here dino, dino....

Proposed deletion of International Conference on Creation


The article International Conference on Creation has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Obscure conference, fails WP:GNG. No reliable source other than NCSE, which keeps track on a wide range of not-particularly-notable creationists & creationist events.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 17:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. ''Don't add your personal commentary to references; if you have concern about the reliability of a source, the correct action is to raise the question on the article talk page, or on WP:RSN. '' KillerChihuahua ?!?Advice 22:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Talk Evolutionism
Hi MTDinoHunter, I see you have added a citation needed tag to a comment by an editor on the Talk Page for Evolutionism. I would politely suggest you revisit this and either add a relevant comment on the editor's entry or remove it as it is not intended to be used as a way of seeking clarification of comments made by other editors on Talk Pages. Tmol42 (talk) 15:46, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Metaphysical naturalism. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 19:27, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Trabucogold for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Auntie E. (talk) 00:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)