User talk:MTSWiz101

February 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wizard101 was changed by MTSWiz101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905479 on 2013-02-03T13:36:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:36, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Wizard101 Schools
Ok, i guess they all are equal, but the descriptions were meant to be detailed. Its WIKIPEDIA. You basically just erased everything me and these other people wrote on the schools. I mean you could have at least gave a heads up before deleteing all of the detailed information. It's not unneccesary, it's giving the reader the idea on the story line and what each teacher/school does. No more things need to be removed at all. Your going to ruin Wizard101 Wiki if you keep on removing things. You cant just delete everything a whole bunch of people put their work into just because it "too Much" or "too detailed"... And we werent putting in all of the spells of the school, we were telling the readers what actions most spells do. Such as steal health, AoE, crazy actions, etc. Wizard101 wikipedia IS devoted to giving out info, thats why its an article on the INFORMATION of things in the game.

International Film Music Critics Award
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of International Film Music Critics Award, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://filmmusiccritics.org/about/.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of International Film Music Critics Award


A tag has been placed on International Film Music Critics Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://filmmusiccritics.org/about/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Qpalzmmzlapq &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  02:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of International Film Music Critics Award


A tag has been placed on International Film Music Critics Award, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://filmmusiccritics.org/about/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Black Museum
Thank you for your edits so far to Black Museum (Black Mirror). As the article has passed a good article review and is in a stable version, rather than editing the article directly please make suggestions of substantial changes on the talk page. Additionally, please do not make further aspersions about my motivation in editing the article. I like the episode and reported what I found in high-quality reliable sources despite it often contrasting with my own view. I look forward to discussing this episode with you on the talk page. Thanks! — Bilorv ( talk ) 17:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)