User talk:MUI Gohan

Proposed deletion of 32Stitches


The article 32Stitches has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Very much a CV with promotional elements. See WP:NOTPROMO. Otherwise failing WP:BIO. The sources are very much primary and read like PR."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Accesscrawl (talk) 04:17, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anaida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Healer ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Anaida check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Anaida?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello MUI Gohan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MUI Gohan. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 21:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

I have no issues with accountability. You can make your checks. Till then I'll stop editing the Wikipedia. MUI Gohan (talk) 14:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. SmartSE (talk) 23:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Having reviewed your contributions thoroughly I think it is very likely that you are not being paid to edit here. SmartSE (talk) 23:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Sorry I made a typo that I've now fixed. You've been blocked for undisclosed paid editing not sockpuppetry. Can the reviewing admin please email me and I will explain my reasoning. SmartSE (talk) 08:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrew Ryan (musician)


The article Andrew Ryan (musician) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Created by editor now blocked for advertising, does not meet WP:MUSICBIO"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Melcous (talk) 11:02, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shashicka Tyre-Hill


The article Shashicka Tyre-Hill has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable, books are self published. Does not meet WP:GNG; created by editor now blocked for advertising"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Melcous (talk) 11:03, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jack Be for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Be is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jack Be until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 08:05, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mallika Mehta


Hello, MUI Gohan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mallika Mehta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Dom from Paris (talk) 21:25, 12 August 2019 (UTC)