User talk:MUKBAK

August 2019
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that in this edit to Asian News International, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 13:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Asian News International shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shellwood (talk) 14:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Removing criticism sections
Hi, you've been removing criticism sections from several articles. Please open discussions on the talk pages for those articles and gain consensus before removing sourced content. Thanks. Schazjmd  (talk)  17:18, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 16:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 16:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/. Thank you. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 19:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 4thfile4thrank. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 19:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Asian News International, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 06:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)