User talk:MUNCH0000

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be spanked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Rlevse 16:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

April 2007
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 15:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Please do violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 15:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that i was creating my own sandboxes the lazy way instead of doing it from the offical wiki page won't happen again.

MUNCH0000 18:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
It has become apparent that you have made 1000000 edits so we are thinking about making you an admin. Michael as 10 18:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

So Called sockpuppet of danh90
Dude leave my talk page along just because you think i am danh90 when i am not --MUNCH0000 12:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I am reverting your vandalism of warnings you have been given and things other users have place on your userpage which you shouldn't edit. The fact that I think you are Danh90 is irrelevant, as you admitted to owning 22 sock puppet accounts, which is why you were reported and ultimately blocked. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 12:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

No you claimed when you reported me that i am a sock of danh90 HA that shows its relevent. --MUNCH0000 12:21, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Well all your edits on every sock puppet account you own match the edits of Danh90. I'm not going to argue this with you, as far as I'm concerned you've been indefinitely blocked and that's the end of it. However, this won't stop me reverting your vandalism of other users' warnings. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 12:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Well of yes of course you won't argue with me as you cannot handle the truth of this nature and besides bloking all my accounts is polintless as i have given up vandalising. --MUNCH0000 12:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Why would I take your word as truth? You're a vandal and untrustworthy. Also, it's too late to say you've "given up vandalising" - you've already been indefinitely blocked. Also, this edit says differently about you "giving up vandalism". -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 12:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Lol you forget i gave up on vandalising the artcles and besides i don't usally vandalise my userpages i just did it because i was board and besides since you got phil mitchell and ben mitchell protected all my fun was gone. --MUNCH0000 13:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Good, your "fun" is disruptive, disrespectful and annoying. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 13:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes and i don't care. --MUNCH0000 13:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Blanking
Blanking your user talk page is generally seen as bad form, as it makes it much harder for editors to see a record of your conversations. Why not create an archive instead? Cheers Anna512 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)