User talk:MWOODS

December 2016
There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you for pointing out the UCCA's account; I have blocked them as well per . Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 05:00, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * No, actually, it seams that you don't understand. The "biggest issue" with this account is not the username, but the WP:Conflict of interest. Do you understand our WP:COI policy? Do you agree to respect it (especially the part that says "COI editing is strongly discouraged"). Do you intend to write about your organization if unblock or do you intend to edit something else?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I was going to decline your latest unblock request, but I have decided instead to make an attempt to clarify some of the problems, and give you a chance to address them. It is difficult to imagine how anyone who can read a whole page as unambiguously promotional as the one you edited, and then repeatedly deny that it is promotional, can be expected to edit in the neutral, objective way required for Wikipedia. If you honestly don't see language such as "The ambition of the collection is to be truly timeless", for example, as promotional, then you lack the necessary ability to see how your own writing will look from the detached perspective of an uninvolved outsider. Also, although you have now said that you will not continue to edit the page about your museum, you have not indicated in what other ways you expect your future editing to differ from what you did before the block, so that we can be confident that you won't repeat the same sort of mistakes. Perhaps you can give a brief indication of what you think you may do for Wikipedia in the future. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: M WOODS (December 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:M WOODS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  21:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:M WOODS


Hello, MWOODS. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "M WOODS".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)