User talk:MWiD

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Bigger digger (talk) 15:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Buzz marketing
Hi MWiD,

I've welcomed you as I see you've created Buzz monitoring. I see that another editor has also found it and is trying to help you improve it. You might get an edit conflict as you both try and make changes at the same time. If you need any help reply here and I'll see what I can do. I'll come back later and help you improve the article. Cheers, Bigger digger (talk) 15:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I also see that you're improving Marketing buzz. I think you might have slanted it too far towards the online issues, but again I'll have a look later. Bigger digger (talk) 15:32, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks Bigger Digger. Marketing buzz, or just buzz, refers to eWOM and the term buzz was born from web 2.0 so it would have an obvious online slant. I am thinking that perhaps you feel buzz refers to offline as well as online, but i would disagree with this. Buzz is purely an online affair. But your comments welcome! MWiD.


 * No worries, just trying to help. We can use WP:Reliable sources to determine the content of articles, so no worries on that front. Bigger digger (talk) 17:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Right, I've found some sources for Marketing buzz and have improved it with those. I've taken out some of the online references because none of the sources suggest it is online only. Buzz monitoring I've also found a few sources for, currently included as External links, that need to be digested and incorporated into the article. I've also tried to make the first section a bit clearer and added some wikilinks to other pages. I've also removved the links you put in, they're not really suitable because they are self-published by firms. If you look at the kind of things I've added to Marketing buzz I hope you'll see the difference.
 * I have a bit of a problem with Buzz activation as the phrase just doesn't turn up in WP:Reliable sources to prove it is WP:Notable and therefore appropriate as an article - I've listed some of the problems on the talk page - Talk:Buzz activation and have left the sources in place in the hope someone else will be able to find something similar and expand it. Maybe you could have a go at finding the sources it needs? Thanks for contributing to the encyclopedia, hopefully we can get all these articles into a better shape. Bigger digger (talk) 15:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Buzz monitoring


The article Buzz monitoring has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Buzz activation


The article Buzz activation has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Marketing bullshit, not used enough or discussed enough in reliable sources to make it anything other than a neologism or even a worthy redirect, and the article is effectively unsourced. Editors can discuss ways of increasing marketing buzz in that article using reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fences &amp;  Windows  16:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC)