User talk:M Cedric Pimenta

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:M Cedric Pimenta/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:M_Cedric_Pimenta/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:M_Cedric_Pimenta/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:M Cedric Pimenta/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:M_Cedric_Pimenta/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:M_Cedric_Pimenta/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Mario Pimenta M Cedric Pimenta (talk) 10:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello M Cedric Pimenta. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:M Cedric Pimenta. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I am not getting,I am just trying to write best article and making necessary changes M Cedric Pimenta (talk) 10:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * i am not getting paid M Cedric Pimenta (talk) 10:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Your draft says "Media Coordinator: Mario Pimenta" – do they not pay you for your efforts? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It's just a position in college.
 * I saw a article about Waves,a bits Goa cultural festival so I decided to replicate it for myself.Even the position is left less than a week,before I lose it.I want to show to make it.I am trying my best to make it neutral,I citied local news for authentic information also M Cedric Pimenta (talk) 13:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * also can you point out what makes it sound advertise,the event has already over.
 * Also which references don't work
 * All of them are genuine local digital news websites M Cedric Pimenta (talk) 14:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Filmbuster (June 3)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Filmbuster Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No indication of notability. Sources are primary and/or non-independent (including several copies of the same press release) and for a one-off local event such as this there would have to be multiple secondary sources providing significant coverage of the event.

In addition, the draft is written in a very promotional tone. That could be fixed by editing the text, but the lack of notability can't.

bonadea contributions talk 13:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)