User talk:Maazarshad45

August 2019
Hello, I'm Flight112b. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Terrorism in Pakistan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Flight112b (talk) 14:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Guy (help!) 12:16, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 06:44, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anna Bell Peaks


The article Anna Bell Peaks has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. ~ GB fan 11:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anna Bell Peaks


A tag has been placed on Anna Bell Peaks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ~ GB fan 11:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anna Bell Peaks


A tag has been placed on Anna Bell Peaks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Anna Bell Peaks. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Britishfinance (talk) 12:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The princess of hope, Balochistan


A tag has been placed on The princess of hope, Balochistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://urdunovel1.blogspot.com/2014/10/princess-of-hope.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. A-NEUN  &#10686;TALK&#10686;  09:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Princess of Hope


A tag has been placed on Princess of Hope requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.discover-pakistan.com/princess-of-hope.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 05:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Princess of Hope. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 05:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Sphinx of Balochistan


The article The Sphinx of Balochistan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Completely unsourced article about a rock formation, with no evidence of notability. Article is full of wld speculation about an 'advanced civilization' building it. Entirely unencyclopedic."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 05:08, 24 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I've deleted the article since much of the content is unattributed quotes, and is therefore another copyright violation. You have been warned several times now about copying other people's work instead of writing in your own words with proper references, so I'll say now that next time I will block you indefinitely. Pinging The Mirror Cracked for their infoJimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anna bell Peaks


A tag has been placed on Anna bell Peaks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Anna Bell Peaks. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop. This is the third time you have created an article Anna Bell Peaks in the past month. The first two were speedily deleted and the title was blocked against reposting. Please take that hint. Reposting the article under a slightly different title does not make it notable. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ali


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Anna Bell Peaks. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Please desist in your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia through your abuse of editing privileges and creation of inappropriate pages, you may be blocked without further warning. This notice should be understood as a Final Warning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
creffett (talk) 01:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Indo-Pakistani War of 1965. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. creffett (talk) 01:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Tree of Allah moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Tree of Allah, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 15:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

I will try my best to add reliable sources to the article and add relevant detail and accurate information. Maazarshad45 (talk) 18:13, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

There are no sources to be found, but I give my word that I have seen the tree with my own eyes and there is no rational explaination of its formation, but a logical assumption can be made. It is a natural tree. The tree exists and there can be no other explaination for it. Maazarshad45 (talk) 18:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tree of Allah


Hello, Maazarshad45. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tree of Allah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Balochistan Sphinx for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Balochistan Sphinx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Balochistan Sphinx until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2021 (UTC)