User talk:Mabalu/Archives/2015/April

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:1938 coat designed by Elsa Schiaparelli and Jean Cocteau.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:1938 coat designed by Elsa Schiaparelli and Jean Cocteau.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Good luck with that. Given that it follows right on from the Worth stuff, I wonder about all the motivations behind the nomination. At least, unlike the Worth uploader, I haven't stolen copyrighted photographs. Mabalu (talk) 00:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Charles Frederick Worth
many thanks for the work on tiding up the references etc provided by the students. I had thought to leave it to them once they had completed their study, though I am not sure that would have worked, they are here to study Worth the designer not his article in Wikipedia. Thanks once again, Edmund Patrick – confer 05:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Tetteh Plahar
Please why do you want to delete this article it was first deleted and I had to work on it and ask it to be restored after I had worked on it. Please let me know what I need to do to prevent its deletion.Regards--Rberchie (talk) 09:41, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Thanks Mabalu I am really grateful for your time and how explanatory you have been. Sorry if I may have seemed to do anything out of bad faith. Your points have been clearly well noted. Please make it a stub and give me sometime as I look for concrete evidences to prove my claim. Thanks once again.

TWL HighBeam check-in
Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:


 * Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
 * Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see HighBeam/Citations
 * Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Newspapers.com check-in
Hello Mabalu,

You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Newspapers.com through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:
 * Please make sure that you can still log in to your Newspapers.com account. If you are having trouble let me know.
 * Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, to include citations with links on Wikipedia. Links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. Also, keep in mind that part of Newspapers.com is open access via the clipping function. Clippings allow you to identify particular articles, extract them from the original full sheet newspaper, and share them through unique URLs. Wikipedia users who click on a clipping link in your citation list will be able to access that particular article, and the full page of the paper if they come from the clipping, without needing to subscribe to Newspapers.com. For more information about how to use clippings, see http://www.newspapers.com/basics/#h-clips.
 * Do you write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let me know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you, Wikipedia Library Newspapers.com account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 16:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)