User talk:Mablanco28/sandbox

Your article was very well done and focuses on the facts. The sources and links all worked properly and you were able to share the information without any bias or personal opinions. I did not really see any grammar mistakes or issues with the structure. All of your information is up to date and to the point. Morgans02 (talk) 15:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

I found your addition to be very informative and comprehensive in all! I thought you did great in your sourcing, staying unbiased, and much more. I don't have many suggestions, but here were just a couple of things you may want to consider:Amaini15 (talk) 22:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Amaini15 - In the first paragraph, perhaps you could say that the "growth in agriculture" plays or has a dominant role in Ethiopia's economy. Not really a huge need to edit here, though. - I'm not sure if I'm just misreading it or not, but in the first sentence of the second paragraph of your entry there is a % symbol standing alone without a value. Again, not sure if you forgot something or I might just not be reading it correctly! - Finally, when you bring up your statistic from the WHO in the second paragraph, I might suggest you put (WHO) after you write out the full name of the World Health Organization. This would make it more consistent with the other acronyms you have in your entry where you put the parentheses after the full name. Awesome job in all! Amaini15 (talk) 22:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Amaini15