User talk:Mabuckle

Welcome!
Hello, Mabuckle, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Personality has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Personality was changed by Mabuckle (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882978 on 2018-03-26T01:11:04+00:00.

June 2020
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to John Africa seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Philadelphia Police Department, you may be blocked from editing.   Ed6767  talk!  13:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Philadelphia Police Department. '' We have warned you multiple times, and each one of these warnings also contains links to useful resources. Please don't restore these edits as there are severe POV issues.'' Ed6767  talk!  14:54, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 1985 Cops from Hell Bombing.


The article 1985 Cops from Hell Bombing. has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Heavily POV and poorly sourced article duplicating MOVE."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:16, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
You need to slow down. Creating multiple heavily POV articles (seriously: 1985 Cops from Hell Bombing.?) and writing your preferred version of events will result in the articles being deleted and you being blocked from editing.

Please discuss the issues before continuing. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 04:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Philadelphia Special Investigation Commission (MOVE)


The article The Philadelphia Special Investigation Commission (MOVE) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a helpful daughter article. The commission existed for one and only one investigation and has no notability outside of the 1985 MOVE bombing."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sum mer PhD v2.0 04:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Philadelphia Special Investigation Commission (MOVE)


A tag has been placed on The Philadelphia Special Investigation Commission (MOVE) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Unlikely notable and not a helpful daughter article. The commission existed for one and only one investigation and has no notability outside of the 1985 MOVE bombing."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ed6767  talk!  13:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Anarchism
Hi Mabuckle,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 21:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Your recent editing history at Philadelphia Police Department shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sum mer PhD v2.0 22:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 04:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring at Philadelphia Police Department
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)