User talk:Mac52

Speedy deletion nomination of Raditaz


A tag has been placed on Raditaz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the page that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 23:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, I've seen your message, but it will be tomorrow before I get time to respond  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  17:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Reply
I don't think your article as it stands meets the criteria.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:51, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. The first and third of your refs probably would be acceptable as reliable sources, but they just highlight the product as a potential future challenger to Pandora, it's described as a start-up, and there is no indication of advertising revenue or anything else that would show this to be more than yet another internet radio station. I can't see how it currently meets any of the notability criteria I've linked to
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: '' soon many other platforms... Unlike other streaming services... Interested in seeing what is popular in NYC or LA? Check out the explore feature and discover the latest music trends by location... more than 20 million songs... industry leading... instantly create...
 * Some of the language is second person and unencyclopaedic in tone You can also choose... 
 * I'm not sure why we need all the release dates, but that's no big deal.


 * It's better, but you still have industry leading... instantly create... without a reference, and still some second person You can also choose.... You need to check the language carefully to make sure it can't be read as an advertisement. I'm not convinced of the notability, but all I can suggest is that you have another edit to address the outstanding issues, repost and see what happens.  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  06:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)