User talk:Mac6767

May 2021
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Sulforaphane. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 14:51, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sulforaphane, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sulforaphane was changed by Mac6767 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961886 on 2021-05-06T18:26:24+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:26, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

I really don’t understand what was promotional, advertising or soapboxing (whatever the heck that is??) about posting a factual piece of information on a current drug trial involving a synthesized version of sulforaphane? Ridiculous stance, devoid of objectivity or the ability to employ an open mind - but then only what I’ve come to expect from those with an agenda. Good luck policing your closed shop. Pathetic. Mac6767 (talk) 18:53, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

httPs://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.25.437060v1

Is this soapboxing? Or is this okay because it’s a US entity? Mac6767 (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The link above is a) for a preprint publication, bioRxiv and b) is about primary reearch, far from scientific confirmation, which is best-represented in Wikipedia by a WP:MEDRS review - see WP:MEDASSESS. A soapbox is defined in the link. You entered the commercial website for Evgen and wrote a description of a preliminary clinical trial that has not yet even started. Its results will not be encyclopedia-worthy until it is discussed in a review or the sulforaphane agent is approved by a regulatory agency as a safe and effective drug. Wikipedia is not a news site, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:RECENTISM. Zefr (talk) 20:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)