User talk:MacTheSlayer

Your edits on Green political parties
Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. I see you appear to be new to editing, so I'd just like to point something out. Please do not add the ideology "environmentalism" to the list of ideologies for green political parties. These parties already have the ideology of "green politics" listed. Envormonetalism is one of the key elements of green politics, therefore it is unnecessary to also include it within this section. For more information please see Green Politics. Thank you for your time. Helper201 (talk) 20:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Conservative Party (UK), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Māori Party. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - gadfium 04:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

You have recently added content to both New Zealand First and Māori Party, but the source for the first does not support the content you add - it says the party is conservative, not "social conservatism", and does not mention its position on the left-right spectrum. Of the three sources for the second article, two (going to the same page) are dead links, and an archive of the page does not contain the quotes you give. The third source you gave was the party home page. Finally, the item I reverted before as unsourced you re-added without a reference. This is not acceptable.- gadfium 18:56, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * web.archive.org has now come back online, and I can now see a version of the Māori Party website which does contain these quotes. Why did you not link to the archive rather than give a dead link? And indeed, as I had not asked for a reference for the ideology being indigenous rights, why did you reference that rather than the addition I did want a reference for?- gadfium 04:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Conservative Party (UK). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Once again, please stop adding unsourced "edits". You may face a block if you continue. Thank you.'' David J Johnson (talk) 20:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to New Democratic Party. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 20:25, 1 August 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 04:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Blue Dog Coalition, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Alexander Levian (talk) 23:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

French Communist Party
The source you keep restoring does not corroborate the claim, which is something you've done on several pages now. Please don't make changes to the ideology parameter unless they're properly sourced – i.e., when you add sources, they should explicitly state so. Mélencron (talk) 17:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

political position and sources
When possible it's best not to use news opinion pieces or blogs for political positions. Ehat we are looking for is academic books and articles covering the topic at large. WP:RSOPINION.--Moxy (talk) 22:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. I have blocked you because you have many times added political positions to political parties with a source which does not support the content.- gadfium 06:05, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Liberal Democratic Party of Russia has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 16:59, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Popular Front (France). Chris Troutman ( talk ) 17:01, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ron h jones (Talk) 22:09, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Conservative Party (UK). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David J Johnson (talk) 14:21, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ron h jones (Talk) 14:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

August 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Social Democratic Party (UK). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David J Johnson (talk) 17:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)