User talk:Macaddct1984/Archive 3

Your rollback request
Hello Macaddct1984, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 11:55, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Antarctica
The addition by an IP to Antarctica is supported by Gabriel de Castilla. FYI. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 23:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, well they'll have to add it without getting rid of so much content! ;) -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 23:06, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for adding the source thing on the Republic of Ireland Act 1948 page. 86.41.2.94 (talk) 11:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

92.25.9.25
BTW: it wasn't a blanking. I would surmise that 92.25.9.25 is removing substantial garbage which is why I haven't reverted him. He is not being very helpful with his lack of edit summaries or talk page use either! Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 01:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * That was a mis-click, I meant removal of content. But yes, (s)he's got to be a bit more tactful and explanatory about removing such a large amount of (referenced) content. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 01:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Bollocking
Who are you to give me a bollocking? 86.152.163.162 (talk) 13:59, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This is how the community deals with vandalism, substantial warnings before an eventual block. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 14:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Your welcome
Thank you for your efforts that made you a target! Jim1138 (talk) 22:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Favor returned
Thank you for cleaning up my user talk! I got a good "Wiki love": vandalism accusing me of being a sockpuppet of: ClueBot! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

khator
i assume this is how you talk. never done this before. sorry if it's wrong the parts i removed from Khator's page are wrong - look at the citations. they don't say anything about what's mentioned, and one of them is dead. it's a Public Relations take on Khator that is unrealistic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.197.160.245 (talk) 23:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I see that now, a few of those references are dead. For future reference, please add an edit summary to your edits, otherwise it appears as vandalism, especially when removing content. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 23:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Medieval music topic Request
Hello Macaddct1984, I think you're completely wrong marking me as spam. What I was doing was simply adding more cultural sense of how "medieval music" should be shown (in this case with music attached). For those who really do have cultural background (it was my final dissertation music), we know what are we doing. I do invite you to visit my website, and next time judge before taking actions without sense User:Alasdepollo 00:53, 11 February 2012 —Preceding undated comment added 23:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC).
 * I appreciate your knowledge of the subject, however, Wikipedia is not a collection of links and is not the function of the site to list every reference and resource on each subject. Now, for two days straight various anonymous IP accounts, as well as yours, have been trying to inject this YouTube channel into the article. The content on the channel can only be considered original research and unless the channel is directly related to the article, it does not belong there. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 00:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok, thank you very much for letting me known. Yes, those were my attempts to put my "music research" online. I created even this account, as I did considered it was a great background for the medieval music article (I did see there are many religious links attached but none secular). Sorry, maybe I tried to much tho! However, surely it is more related that seems. Anyway, thanks for taking your time and being polite too! Alasdepollo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alasdepollo (talk • contribs) 00:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Cheers man!!really do appreciate getting your reply! Got annoyed of being "kicked out" from the page, but now I do understand. Thank you.(talk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.37.130.112 (talk) 01:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment by Safehouse69
Zionists end up in hell. Do you want to end in hell, zionist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Safehouse69 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Businessman Danny Watts
I see you have started a discussion on my article on Danny Watts? For what reason? Then maybe I can defend it being here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby999UK (talk • contribs) 17:09, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Articles on Wikipedia must adhere to a certain notability and require reliable sources, especially in the case of biographies. It's currently being discussed here, if you'd like to voice your opinion. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 17:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Your reverting the external link under Java Generics added by ted-gao
The link was to a decent tutorial on type wildcard, Java Generics. Could you please scan the tutorial before you revert the link again? Thanks. (talk)
 * While it may have been in your best intentions, Wikipedia is not a collection of links. Please have a look at what links are best to be avoided. The link you're adding, along with your username, makes me (and others, it seems) suspicious of your intentions and an apparentconflict of interests, specifically self-promotion. At the moment, your link just is not appropriate. --MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 02:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I thought that the number one reason for Wikipeida's existence was to make knowledge (easily) accessible for people. I understand that there must be certain controls on external links. The governance, however, can be done a little bit more technical (or with a little bit more intelligence - solely in the technological sense). I myself benefited frequently from external links on Wikipedia and I believe others may benefit from the external link that I added. The only thing promoted is the article linked to. I have to say that I am very disappointed by the way that you use your power. -- ted-gao (talk)

Question from User:71.208.49.74
Excuse me but how are you supposed to talk to the administrators/users? From User:71.208.49.74 (Talk)
 * Responded on user's talk page -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 02:08, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for putting the citation to its place. I'm new at editing Wiki pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.116.68.105 (talk) 14:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Greek police
Ah. So if I get an article about those murders, can I put a list back on, please? Does the article have to be in English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.255.177.125 (talk) 14:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * English-language articles are preferred, but there is a policy regarding non-English language sources. The primary factor is that it must be a reliable source. Also, be careful of how you phrase it, as murder has certain implications behind it, particularly that it was a planned killing. Perhaps "implicated in the deaths of" would be more neutral. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 14:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * ok, good enough. I got links which show that the Greek Police have conspired to kill or premeditated to kill people, especially immigrants and that killing a civilian is regarded as an "internal affair" in the Greek police force. This especially true of the murder of Alexis Grhgoropoulos. The links are in Greek though. So, my question is, what would be an acceptable level of verifiability in order to preserve the word "murder"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.255.177.125 (talk) 15:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * If you find a reliable source, such as a newspaper article, that uses the phrase "murder", it might be more justified. I'm not very familiar with the incidents surrounding the Greek police, but I think it's generally best to remain as neutral as possible. If "killing" or "fatally shot" can be used instead of "murder", it's probably for the best. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 15:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

KeyScan Inc deletion?
Macaddct1984, There is a canadian company by the name of KeyScan in wikipedia. Can you please explain why KeyScan Inc US company with innovative products is bound for deletion. Advise is highly appreciated(OR 16:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)). — Preceding unsigned comment added by February2012 (talk • contribs)
 * Articles must assert some form of notability. Not every company and organization is deserving of a Wikipedia article. Article must also have reliable sources and references independent of the subject. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 16:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Macaddct1984,I have added few references.(OR 05:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)) Hello Macaddct1984, took your advice and set up new page. Would it be possible for you to review and comment? Thanks --OR 14:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by February2012 (talk • contribs)

Thanks again, following I made some more changes. Can you please review? --OR 19:33, 21 February 2012 (UTC)--OR 00:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by February2012 (talk • contribs)

Urshan College
I am wondering why my page "Urshan College" was deleted. It states it was deleted for G8 that it depended on a deleted site. Both of the sites that I reference in the article are currently existing sites. This is an educational institution and I made this article in order to outline the school itself. If any changes should be made, please let me know. I would like to ask that you reconsider removing the page. I am more than willing to make any changes. Thank you! Tdhenson86(talk) 02:46, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I was not the one who made the executive decision on the deletion of the article. I initially recommended it for deletion because it read like a promotional advert for a college that (it appeared) had not even opened yet. It probably is likely to fail on the notability aspect as well. However, if you'd like to get in touch with the person who ultimately removed it, the deletion log says Peridon is the person. You can contact him on his talk page. Make sure to have reliable sources as well as independent citations. Good luck! -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 02:56, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate your input. I apologize if the site seemed to be promotional or advertisement. This college has already been approved. It is actually a merger of two current schools. They will host their first classes under the new name this fall. I simply wanted to include a page on the new name of the school and information about changes to the school. Thank you! Tdhenson86 (talk) 20:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Could you please take a look at the new page and give me feedback? Peridon has looked at it and made some edits. I would love your input as well. Thank you! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tdhenson86/Urshan_College Tdhenson86 (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Flash Clocks
I'm sorry if the page sounded promotional. I'm new here and would be so grateful if you can help by identifying specific areas that I could rework on to improve the article and any other way you can be of help. I do this purely on my personal interest and the desire to contribute and share knowledge. Thank you. [SAtalebe 03:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)] — Preceding unsigned comment added by SAtalebe (talk • contribs)
 * Hi there, if I recall correctly, I believe the content was not notable and its only purpose seemed to be to promote the flash clock website. It may not have been your intention to advertise the site, but have a look at Wikipedia's policy on website articles. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 12:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

WP CVN
You use WP CVN too? Neat. (If you're going to reply, please do it on my page.) Math321 (talk) 23:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Champagne City (Blue song)
Hello Macaddct1984. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Champagne City (Blue song) to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Danger High voltage! 14:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Cheers
a wonderous thanks for not even taking in what i say and undoing an edit without a thought — Precedingunsigned comment added by 144.131.193.213 (talk) 00:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

the issue of the complication
btw im 14 and im doing a powerpoint presentation on sweat shops and all my class mates are might be reading this right now and as soon as they read "issue" they might think " oh i guess its a problem then " and maybe if they read "complication" they might think " oh its complicated, so both anti - sweatshop and pro - sweatshop activists might be right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.131.193.213 (talk) 01:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
 Whenaxis  talk &middot; &#32;contribs &#124; DR goes to Wikimania!  21:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Jewish Rehab Hospital
Read the article's talk page. --MaxAMSC (talk) 00:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem! I've added an "under construction" tag to the article. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 00:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. --MaxAMSC (talk) 22:25, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Working to get it right
Thank you for the info about the Mr.CAP wiki Page deletion. We just need a little time to get more verifiable sources. Corneliusapratt (talk) 20:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Just a Question
If an article is made and posted for deleation, how long would it take to be deleated?

Thanks! Toontown59153 (talk) 18:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * It depends on how it's classified. If the article is considered a candidate for speedy deletion, it's deleted very quickly. PROD is for articles that should probably be deleted quickly, but don't quite meet the specific criteria for speedy deletion. Finally, there's Articles for Deletion (AFD), which require a group discussion and consensus before they get deleted. Those are generally used for articles that someone feels is not quite notable enough for an article.


 * Hope that helps! -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 19:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks! That defiantly helps!! :) Toontown59153 (talk) 21:09, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Moore Link
you deleted the addition before I add the link, this was quick. Do you have time limitation when you can review and add. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.18.180.58 (talk) 14:42, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Your addition had more than just the issue of being unsourced. Wikipedia has a very strict policy on biographies on living persons. Content on Wikipedia, especially biographies, must adhere to a neutral point of view. The statment: "Dr. Moore is the greatest embryologist in medicine." certainly fails NPOV and is an impossible claim to source. Furthermore, sources need to be reliable and your constant addition of this link almost certainly fails that test. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 14:54, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Daksh Sahay
Hello Macaddct1984. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Daksh Sahay, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 15:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

MAACA.org
Hey there Macaddct1984,

Just noticed your message in regards to the post not quite being for an encyclopedia, I'm just trying to figure out why exactly?, maaca.org is a website dealing with tips, how to's and tons more knowledge into the hobby of Pinball, anyone looking for information in regards to their machines, even quick help to fix something usually gets an answer within minutes and can bring their historic machine back to life. The entire premise of this site is the hobby aspect of pinball, arcade machines and the love to keep them alive.

Sorry if someone looking up "Pinball" wouldn't like to find a great source and information in regards to their machines, history, and fixing/repairing tips.

please do let me know if there is a way our source could be added.

Thank you.

Regards, Murrsky. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murrsky (talk • contribs) 18:11, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Rastiniak comment
The page where my name was smeared as a non-zionist is the work of a group of liers that are Jewish facsicts.

There is not a single evidence to call me an anti zionist except for me having charged these people legally at the court in Israel and their hatred to me because I represent for them the native sabra Israeli who fought in Israeli wars while they were picking their noses.

I can only warn you that if you do not delete my name from the list of these infamous people you are yourself subject to the possibility of legal charges against you.

Sincerely,

Professor Amiram Goldblum — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rastiniak (talk • contribs) 18:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi there Rastiniak, just to begin by clarifying, my edit was a response to these edits by you, which certainly violates Wikipedia's policy on maintaining a neutral point of view. Looking at the biographical article you take issue with, I agree that the sources look dubious and likely fails Wikipedia's very strict policy on biographies of living people. While writing this, it appears FisherQueen has removed the controversial content and it should stay that way until more reliable sources can be provided. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 18:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hope you don't mind my butting in; I was doing new user patrol and noticed that this person was getting understandably angry about this article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:36, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Not at all, it's very welcomed. I'm always happy to have someone more experienced help out. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 18:40, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for removing that vandalism from my page. You saw it before I did! (Pretty sad when the vandals have to stoop to "gay" insults huh ?    :)   )

"....We are all Kosh...." <-Babylon-5-> 18:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Such is the price we pay for our vigilant anti-vandalism efforts. Keep up the good work. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 19:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

I felt threatened
Hi there. Today you sent me this message: Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:I dream of horses. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. I can't believe you would attack me like that, threatening to block me. I just want to say I'm very sad and angry that you would say that. Please don't say things like that to me or anyone else ever again. - 208.127.111.135 (talk) 02:56, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

FYI
Hi Macaddct1984, After a long time, i've logged into huggle today & accidentally reverted your edit and fixed again, sorry for the mistake :)-- Shanmugam p7   (talk) 13:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

FBI Police
The FBI Police are not located in Chicago or LA. They are only located in DC, New York, Quantico, and Clarksburg WV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.150.2.29 (talk) 13:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Have a look at this link which shows all of their national field offices. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 13:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

There are many field offices but only 4 locations actually have FBI Police. I can't find an official link but this forum discusses it in detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.150.2.29 (talk) 13:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. I didn't realize the article is referring to FBI Police specifically. I'm not familiar enough with the subject to say either way on the matter, but the burden of proof can lie with the claim that the locations exist. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 13:48, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

HELP
Hi im a user and cluebot is sayin im gonna get banned for bad editz? i was helping the george stanaka page. why is he saying that?--100.0.38.243 (talk) 02:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Have a look at Wikipedia's guideline on vandalism. Your edits are not constructive and, despite your best intentions, are considered vandalism. If you keep contributing to articles the way you are you will receive a short ban. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 02:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Additional links
Hi Macaddct, would it be appropriate to add links to nonprofit organizations in the "additional links" section of those articles? The inclusion of O'Neill Sea Odyssey is notable and I think the video is very informative. Thank you for your assistance in helping me learn more about the rules of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.193.253.212 (talk) 10:42 am, 6 September 2012, Thursday (UTC−5)
 * Hi there. I noticed you added information about the Giving Library in the John D. Arnold article, which is certainly relevant and appropriate. However, other articles that are tangentially associated with the website should really not be included and most of the non-profits have official websites that are already listed. External links that should be avoided is a good resource and guideline to use. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 14:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. However, I'm still a bit confused. Would you classify the Executive Director of, say, O'Neill Sea Odyssey, talking about the organization (as was included in the link I provided) as only "tangentially related" to the O'Neill Sea Odyssey page ? It seems highly relevant to me. Additionally, I'm not sure which of the "links to be avoided" I am violating. Perhaps it's "links mainly intended to promote a website," but the website itself is intended to promote the organizations and has no stake in promoting itself. In addition, seeing as the site is entirely free, clean and does not sell ads. It does not seem to violate any of the other items listed. Thanks for your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.193.253.212 (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)


 * It may perhaps be more appropriate to list it as a reference within the article, rather than a direct external link. For example "The director appeared in and said such and such in a Giving Library video. [1]". However, these references seem more appropriate in a Giving Library article rather than the reverse. If you feel it's truly notable and relevant to the article (perhaps passing notable events), go ahead and add it, but I would be cautious adding it as an embedded link, like this as it is poor practice. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 04:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

The Search for King Solomon's Mines duplication
Hi, I see that you correctly moved The Search For King Solomon's Mines to The Search for King Solomon's Mines. However, it looks like the article creator thought that their article had been prematurely deleted and so they recreated it. Thus we now have duplication. NB: The incorrectly titled article (with "For") has since been augmented. A fix would be much appreciated. Regards,  Esowteric + Talk  13:14, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for the fix.  Esowteric + Talk  15:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem, I'm not sure why my move edit never showed up in the history of the first article. Glad I could help! -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 15:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Untitled Star Trek sequel
My bad! I didn't even think of it in terms of the page losing it's history, and wasn't aware I could move pages myself so thanks for that :) I back tracked as best I could and put in a request to unprotect the page so it can be moved. Thanks and sorry for the trouble :/ Lady Lotus (talk) 18:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Haha, no problem! Looks like you got it sorted out. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 18:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of XSDTRK
Can you please verify the changes made to the page, we have adjusted the way it is written. Please feel free to let us know further adjustments that need to be made in order to keep the page open.

Thanks you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vgm2012 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Have a look at the notability criteria for a musical artist/group. Unfortunately, it appears that XSDTRK fails to meet any of those criteria. I'll post this on the talk page of the article, as it's a more appropriate discussion there. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 18:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation newsletter
Hey. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Smiley
Have you seen anything about the film? The entire premise is to do with an urban legend originating on 4chan's /b/ board. I'm not going to pursue this any further as really don't care, do what you want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minus3 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The film is fictional, not a documentary, so it's very possible 4chan doesn't even exist in the film's universe. The only official synopsis comes from the official movie page which makes no mention of the origin of the urban legend. Until the movie is released or a reliable source is available, it's best to just leave out speculation about its origin. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 16:01, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiMedicine
Hi I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page. Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders. Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 06:56, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC this Saturday Dec 1
You are invited to Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and workshops focused on film and the performing arts that will be held on Saturday, December 1, 2012, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.

All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and at meetup.com!--Pharos (talk) 07:27, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Figured I'd mention
After 5 years, we finally added the Martin Heidgen stuff to Meadowbrook State Parkway. ;) - Mitch 32 (Victim of public education, 17 years and counting) 03:16, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Haha, thanks! I had forgotten I'd even suggested that! -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 03:34, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Celebration and Mini-Conference in NYC Saturday Feb 23
You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 12th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Saturday February 23, 2013 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here, or at bit.ly/wikidaynyu. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues!

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience!--Pharos (talk) 02:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

macaddct, you are actually pretty cool — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.224.46 (talk) 01:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup NYC this Sunday April 14
Hi Macaddct1984! You're invited to our next meeting for Wikipedia Meetup NYC on Sunday April 14 -this weekend- at Symposium Greek Restaurant @ 544 W 113th St (in the back room), on the Upper West Side in the Columbia University area.

Please sign up, and add your ideas to the agenda for Sunday. Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Pharos, 18:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration. Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 20:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
 * Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
 * If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

File:Fibonacci Spiral.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fibonacci Spiral.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Fibonacci Spiral.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fibonacci Spiral.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)