User talk:Maccloyd

I am new to this, but I noticed this, and it is obviously vandalism in an article. If I am not going about this right, someone please let me know. I made an edit, and this is my rational.

I deleted the nonsense sentence "Examinations and T-REX rays showed that the man's head was undamaged after it was attacked by a dinosaur, and his heart, lungs and liver were well preserved." T-REX rays? Dinosaurs? I suspect that there was some truth in this sentence before it was altered by someone. This sentence was the start of the second paragraph under under "Scientific examination and conclusions".

Quite possibly, some legitimate information has been lost here. Was that x-rays? And was "dinosaur" something else that was factual?Maccloyd (talk) 02:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)