User talk:Machiavelli11

yo

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Touch Of Light (talk) 03:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Your current report to the administrators was faulty, in order to sucessfully and correctly report a user you need to have evidence regarding that account having gone against the rules of Wikipedia. "Impersonating me" is not a valid reason, and just cause the administrators to deal with more spam then they have to. Touch Of Light (talk) 03:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Nord-Kivu Conflict
To answer your question ("WHy?") I reverted your edit because you blanked a page and replaced it with a spurious speedy deletion notice. dcd139 (talk) 03:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You're still a bit of a newbie, but generally when a vandal comes along, you must leave a warning on their talk page as well, which can be found here: Uw-warn. I see that you don't have rollback yet - once you get it, Huggle makes life a hell of a lot easier. Until then, keep up the good work, --Machiavelli11 (talk) 03:47, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Your editing history
You created a new account and in a few minutes proceeded to blank most of the content of six article and post dubious speedy deletion templates on them. Your only edits were vandalism, indicating a vandalism-only account. Your familiarity with obscure processes such as Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, where you falsely accused another editor of impersonating you, and your familiarity with the page for warning templates, and with Huggle indicates you are not a new and naive editor. Edison (talk) 03:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)