User talk:Maclyn611

Please add content to stub, instead of creating articles and adding the stub message to them. Thanks, enjoy editing wikipedia. :) --Flockmeal 03:24, Apr 17, 2004 (UTC)

Feedback about your radio editing
You did a good job making the List of radio stations in Georgia (U.S. state) page more complete. However, are you SURE that WUWG 91, B92, and Kiss 103 are the only radio stations in Carrollton, Georgia?? Radio stations in a specified United States city are usually common enough that there is at least one station per nearest whole number, and this is only 3 stations in a range from 88 to 108.

Are you interested in what to put in articles for the given radio stations?? If so, go to Talk:List of radio stations in Georgia (U.S. state) and you will see some things to put in. Those labelled as "basic characteristics" are for the list article itself, and those labelled "advanced characteristics" are for the article on the station. 66.245.73.162 21:54, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Great drawing at Image:Eskimo-kinship-chart.png! Keep it up! Very informative. Menchi 05:31, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Maclyn611 02:30, 9 May 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

I am new at Wikipedia, and I would appreciate your help. I began writing a page on medieval weaponry, but its getting complicated and I need someone to help make some calls. I do not know how to use the Wiki formats, (bullets etc.) so I made an outline.

swords scimitars broadsword european broadsword chinese dao dueling sword/shortsword arming sword rapier off-hand weapons buckler dagger smallsword two handed great sword backsword mortuary sword sabre certain falchions scramasax other shining sword gladius spatha katana falchion maces battle axes one hand pole axe short axe two hand yard long haft (handle) axe lances bows longbows warbows crossbows catapult battering ram trebuchet ballista daggers (mentioned earlier, might not need this) torture weapons other African throwing knife tiger claw wrist knife early guns cannons

Since you are participating in the Wiki Weapons projects, I was hoping you could help me, maybe wikify it, check my information or point out mistakes. I got my information mostly from http://home.comcast.net/~sylvanarrow/ which is just a disorganized listing of medieval weaponry anyway. I would appreciate if you helped me. I don't why the outline looks so messed up, but I don't know how to fix it either.

Article for Atlanta newspaper
Hello! I'm writing about Wikipedia and I'd like to talk with you about being a Georgia-based contributor. Please contact me if you're interested. My story deadline is Friday.

Thank you!

--Kayakembe 17:59, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Response
I've made a response to what you wrote on Talk:List of radio stations in Georgia by city. Feel free to make whatever responses you can. Georgia guy 23:17, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Re: Officer Candidate School
I agree, after thinking about it, that the TRADOC template would be more appropreate on a seperate Officer_Candidates_School_%28U.S._Army%29 page. Thank you for your edit. &mdash; Linnwood 14:22, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Utilitarianism
Hello. I found your profile on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Philosophy|WikiProject Philosophy]]. I'm looking for more perspectives to help resolve a debate in the Utilitarianism article on the difference between the "Happiness" and the "Good". If you have any comments on the subject, please feel free to share them on the article's talk page. Thanks! --Malathion 8 July 2005 04:36 (UTC)

Lewis H. Morgan
In your kinship articles you have "Louis Henry Morgan" instead of "Lewis Henry Morgan", I've put a redirect to the main article, but you might want to insert the correct wikilink in your articles and then have the redirect deleted. DelftUser 13:41, 2005 July 11 (UTC)

Proposed Georgia Move
As a past participant in the discussion on how to handle the Georgia pages, I thought you might be interested to know that there's a new attempt to reach consensus on the matter being addressed at Talk:Georgia (country). Please come by and share your thoughts to help form a consensus. --Vengeful Cynic 03:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:M60cmg.png
Do you have any sources of this picture?--Sanandros 09:12, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:West-Georgia-Sign.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:West-Georgia-Sign.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 04:04, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

image mess
this edit by you has resulted in the previously used image being put up on IFD as an orphan, and a duplicate image being uploaded. I suggest you talk to some of the people going around doing all this image deleting and explain what you were trying to accomplish. I've reverted the edit to the original image, which is properly licensed. ... aa:talk 23:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:RifleM4-wGrip-Small.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RifleM4-wGrip-Small.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Graphics Lab
I saw your name listed on Wikiproject Illustration or  the list of graphic artists, and I thought I'd let you know that a Graphics Lab has been created on EN. Based on the highly successful French and German graphics labs, it seeks to better organise and coordinate our graphic design and photo-editing efforts. Up until now, there has been no common space on EN where users could ask for maps, charts and other SVG files to be created. What's more, the Graphics Lab has discussion boards, tips, tools and links; in sum, a good common workspace. Come help us out! The infrastucture is already in place, and now we need participants. :) -- Zantastik  talk  00:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:PhiSigmaTauKey.png, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 19:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Benelli_m4_1.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Benelli_m4_1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —xyzzyn 00:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Invite


Gregbard 04:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

RE: Tracer aerodynamics
The article on tracer rounds mentions that flight paths of tracers can diverge from the non-tracer flight path, especially over distances. I am interested in how much divergence one would expect over shorter distances of between 10 yards and 50 yards.

This involves a public interest environmental suit filed by our organization. We propose firing tracers into a berm that is alleged to be so effective that it stops all lead bullets from entering Lake Michigan. The test is to prove that ricochets into the lake are a common event during firing so as to prove ongoing violations under the Clean Water Act. I am interested to know where there is a discussion of this flight path issue, presumably by the DOD or one of its branches.

Please contact me at steve@ecoesq.com

Thanks,

Steven Pollack —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bathgems (talk • contribs) 17:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:90mm_m79_01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:90mm_m79_01.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

File:University-of-West-Ga-Satellite.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:University-of-West-Ga-Satellite.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:26, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)