User talk:Macquan1

A conservative on here should unblock my account before one of these stupid unemployed liberals blocks it again
"I understand what I was blocked for" -- Tell us about it. What did you do? — Berean Hunter   (talk)  17:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

So you ask "What did you do?"

I simply stated this on the talk page for user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yamla:

''Why did you state this threat on Mark Dice's talk page?

Hello,

Why did you put this threat on the Mark Dice talk page?

"prompted by recruitment from the subject's YouTube prompting may result in a prompt block from editing"?

Just so you know, no one is "prompted by recruitment" to come here.

If people see something that is obviously unfair, they are going to call those out for their unfair behavior.

People are allowed to freely discuss topics in a dialogue without being threatened because of your status as an administrator in which it appears you are unfairly going to take advantage of in order to silence speech that you personally don't agree with, but which doesn't violate any sort of rules or policies or terms of service or even guidelines. '' And I simply stated this on the talk page for user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ian.thomson

''Why isn't TonyBallioni being blocked for incorrectly calling The Washington Times "a fringe publication" or "a fringe source"?

I just read the talk page of TonyBallioni where he incorrectly calls The Washington Times "a fringe publication" and "a fringe source".

How can he just subjectively claim that an extremely professional and very major and famous news network in the United States of America is "a fringe publication" or "a fringe source"?

That is extremely inappropriate and obviously shows that he is biased because of that.

He cannot just write-off an entire major news network in this nation as not being a reliable source, just because he incorrectly believes that to be so in his incorrect way of thinking.''

And then I was improperly blocked by you for:

''CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.''

Therefore, you are the person who needs to be explaining to me why you blocked me improperly.

Why did you block my page improperly?

Are you another unemployed, deep in student loan debt, liberal arts major, butthurt liberal incapable of starting a business and who just can't get over the fact that Donald Trump legitimately won the US presidential election and that you are a crybaby because you liberals are losing the public narrative to proper American conservative thought and therefore you have to hide on Wikipedia all day to try to unfairly shape thoughts and opinions into a liberal bias which is an utter failure?Macquan1 (talk) 18:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Why no. You got things really wrong...again. And for today's consolation prize we have revoked your talk page access. Way to go winner.
 * I also think this user is confused. They've never edited my user page (or my user talk page), at least not with this account. They are probably thinking of a different user. --Yamla (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 18:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 21:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Noting further confusion at UTRS. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)