User talk:Macquigg/archive

Articles for deletion nomination of Deepwater oil spill prevention
I have nominated Deepwater oil spill prevention, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  — fetch ·  comms   01:39, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Check for suggestions made in Articles for deletion/Deepwater oil spill prevention Paulscrawl (talk) 21:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

BP public relations - sponsored link buy
Responded to your query with stats (suggest you re-read source & refs in article): at [|BP public relations - sponsored link buy] -- Paulscrawl (talk) 00:35, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Offshore oil spill prevention and response
Renamed article as such per several persons' suggestions and our discussion, reference sources, revised lead, and to match proposed outline on article Talk page. I'll keep that version of Outline, the one on article's Talk page, up to date, syncing your suggested changes to structure of oil drilling sub-section there. That's our line in the sand. Actual tech content stays in our sandboxes for now. On talk page, replaced oil drilling sub-sections with those of your sandbox outline, deleting shear ram, per your message. I'll keep an eye open and change that structure as you do. Meanwhile, I'll be adding a few history sentences to lead, with view to adding internationalization, per JTSchriber's feedback. Will minimize regulatory jargon in this intro, reserving details for main body paragraph. The rest in our sandboxes for a while -- mine's a mess: more an analytical sentence outline and reference folder than a draft. Not as big as it looks: I'll collapse the sub-sub sections per outline. Yours is looking good! No worries on vote re: articles nomination for deletion -- unanimous to keep. You can vote, too. Paulscrawl (talk) 11:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Cool. this is going to be a great article! I appreciate all the hard work you have done. --Dave (talk) 12:12, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for recent edit: well said. Paulscrawl (talk) 19:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Your support
Hello, I see you are an electrical engineer. I am electrical engineer myself and I've proposed a new wikiproject, Electrical Engineering. Here is the link. I would like to ask your support. Please do participate in the discussion. Thank you. Shriram (talk) 15:14, 7 April 2012 (UTC)