User talk:Macrocosmic microcosm

December 2009
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 08:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Zorzos
Why are you making minor edits to Zorzos when it is going to be deleted for copyright? Eeekster (talk) 08:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

I thought people vote to keep articles, so if I fix it, it might be kept.--Macrocosmic microcosm (talk) 08:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not a vote when copyright is involved. Eeekster (talk) 08:31, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Please slow down!
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 09:04, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I do that because sometimes I make a lot of big changes and then the connection is lost before I could save it, so it was a waste of time. But if I lose the connection before I save a small change, it isn't as bad.--Macrocosmic microcosm (talk) 09:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)


 * If you're having connection problems when making large edits, you may want to copy-and-paste the section or article that you're editing into a text file, make the changes you want to make, then refresh Wikipedia, copy-and-paste the edited text into the edit window, preview, then save. Saving after every single little change means you are clogging up the recent changes list, which makes it hard to patrol for vandalism.  Thanks! --SquidSK (1MC•log) 09:20, 19 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Please stop making so many small edits. This type of editing could be considered disruptive for the reasons I described above.  --SquidSK (1MC•log) 10:32, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Stop this
Please stop making edits such as "fixing" codes - this is useless. I'll have to block for disruptive editing if you continue because you're merely clogged Special:RecentChanges. Ta'. GARDEN 11:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Please stop producing dozens of minuscule edits, as they are regarded as disruptive! Materialscientist (talk) 11:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

It must be done this way, the article is bad, I have to fix it. Almost done with it.--Macrocosmic microcosm (talk) 11:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I didn't believe them when they said it was disruptive because that recent changes thing doesn't make any sense and I did it a lot before before I made an account and nobody ever said anything about it, but if I could edit again I will copy the text ctrl + c in case the connection loses instead of making a bunch of smaller changes.--Macrocosmic microcosm (talk) 12:27, 19 December 2009 (UTC)