User talk:MacroglossumStellatarum

Your submission at Articles for creation: Opuntia ficus-indica (November 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Opuntia ficus-indica and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Opuntia ficus-indica, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Opuntia_ficus-indica Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Opuntia_ficus-indica reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Opuntia ficus-indica
Hi I hope you haven't left. I thought your writing was interesting enough, I went through your proposal and improved it where I could. Typos, undefined undefineds, etc. I hope you will integrate your material into the main article. (I suggest more citations and phrasing some of the opinions as opinions but mostly it looks good to me.) Invasive Spices (talk) 18:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)