User talk:Macwilli

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Katamari Damacy, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 17:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

If you're interested in posting video game reviews online, that's great, but it's more appropriate for a personal weblog than an encyclopaedia. --McGeddon (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Game design
Hello,

Thank you for being bold in your recent edits. However, I have removed several of your good faith additions to the Game design article for I feel it is not appropriate for encyclopaedic purposes in its current form. It is necessary that the material presented is verifiable, which means sourced with proper references. The material must also be written in prose, which excluded the use of second person. Contact me, if you feel the material you added should be restored and I will address issues individually. — Hellknowz ▎talk 19:24, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello Macwilli! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place   on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! JamesBWatson (talk) 19:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

I have looked at all of your edits so far. Unfortunately almost all of them add your own personal analysis or opinions, and none of them gives any sources to indicate where your information comes from. Wikipedia articles are supposed to be objective accounts based on existing sources, not editors' personal views. I suggest reading a few of the pages linked to from the welcome message I have posted above. Particularly relevant are the links on "no original research", "notability", "reliable sources", and "what Wikipedia is not", all of which will show up if you click the "show" link next to "policies and guidelines". Please also feel very welcome to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Macwilli/Affects of Animation on Youth Culture


A tag has been placed on User:Macwilli/Affects of Animation on Youth Culture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)