User talk:MadHaTTer666

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hacker (computer security), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints / Mistakes  00:47, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hacker (computer security). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hacker (computer security) was changed by MadHaTTer666 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889468 on 2011-06-04T00:52:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Hacker (computer security). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. - SudoGhost&trade; 01:14, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Hacker (computer security). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SudoGhost&trade; 01:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Hacker (computer security), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Marek. 69  talk  01:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:53, 4 June 2011 (UTC) 


 * It's clear that you don't understand that that you may not use Wikipedia for spamming or promotion of any kind, open-source or not. Please read WP:SPAM again, if necessary. You have my age wrong by forty years, by the way.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:40, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The Cisco and Comptia links are merely pointless links to general sites. The other three links you keep posting are the real problem, apart from the fact that your additions are unencyclopedic fragments stuck into the middle of the article.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:57, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

P.S. It might also help your case if you would write in clear English rather than txt or 1337 or whatever dialect your edits up to this point have been written in. —DoRD (talk) 03:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)