User talk:MadMak'sBack

I am going to give this one go, and one go only. If the answer is in the negative, I trust you understand by now the implications of the decision and I will want to know why. If it's in the affirmative, I solemnly promise not to engage in personal attacks, which appears to have been my "downfall" in the past. The sockppt issue was total BS. Let me explain why:

My request for unblocking has been treated with contempt by Gregalton and others in the past. Misessus, another Austrian, has similarly been treated with contempt by mainstream zealots such as LK, JQ and others, with Misessus openly (and reasonably) accusing the mainstream zealot JQ of engaging in base censorship. Given my previous bitter experience propogating Austrian thought, and the zealotry against its accurate propogation, I knew some of my edits would be "controversial" given my experience with censorship. This turned out to be 100% accurate.

Because I simply prepared ahead, to counter the simple and predictable censorship tactics of the zealots, I was then punished. I did not use multiple socks to play off each other after the first KiK ban, as Carol has unjustifiably alleged. I have only used another sock after being unjustifiably banned, as clearly spelt out and broadcast here on Gregalton's talk page. Outsmarting barbaric zealots who seek censorship of the Austrian School should not be classified as base sockpptry, akin to vandalism, or graffiti. It is simply staying one step ahead of the barbaric zealots who seek to destroy "enemies" at all costs. What costs? Well, the zealot JQ reverted my very thoughtful edits on systemic risk here. Carol censored discussion on the Libertarian talk page here. This is materially affecting the quality of WP in these areas.

My edits are obviously worthy and scholarly and objective. The articles prior to my amendments on Austrian School, Austrian Business Cycle Theory, systemic risk and (arguably) Libertarianism were all second-rate, amateurish, poorly inelegantly written. Carol is (I hate to say this) an egotist on a power trip, as are many on WP including JQ. The perfect example right now: look at systemic risk. Look at the improvements I made. Look at what JQ did. He called my edits vandalism. Can you believe that? Look at the state JQ has left it in, without making one new edit. This is insane. This is Dark Ages censorship, completely against WP policy. My original barring was unjustified due to the zealots wanting to bar me from a "controversial" discussion, just like JQ threatened to do against Misessus and the whole Austrian School. JQ's unreasoned narrow-minded insane zealotry against the Austrian School is plain scary. Misessus has been intimidated out of contributing further on WP. This is Godfather intimidation of scholars and true academics. This is unacceptable and must be fought, by any means necessary.

JQ continues to go onto the Austrian School page, compulsively making unnecessary deletions and trying to censor any criticism of his "hero" Paul Krugman like some pathetic starry-eyed juvenile groupie. Why can't narrow-minded mainstreamers stick to editing their own neo-Keynesian pages? Why do they need to graffiti and disturb the scholarship going on in areas against which they are openly, bitterly, compulsively, contemptuously opposed? Why are they permitted to do this, and defenders of the Austrian School barred when they step in to defend the School against blunt, barbaric attacks? JQ rarely if ever contributes anything. He simply deletes and uses policies such as WP:UNDUE as a fig leaf for his narrow-minded, second-rate zealotry against the Austrian School. The guy is an embarrassment to the world's second oldest "profession": protecting the money changers. I ask you to judge Gregalton, Satori Son, Carol, JQ and LK with the same rigor they have judged me. I think you will find them narrow minded bigots, zealots, and egotists unworthy of scholarly thought and unworthy of WP's goals and endeavor. They belong in second-rate academic positions (which most, no doubt, currently have) where they can be kings on top of their tiny weenie little castles. WP is a broad endeavor that should not be limited by the bigotry of the past. It should tolerate "controversial" views on topics from debt-based monetary system to systemic risk to anal sex to Seymore Butts to Paul Krugman.

My barring was based on censorship. Not my conduct. I have always fought honestly to portray the truth, objectively and clearly on WP and spent many hours of valuable time and a significant portion of my (no doubt) short life editing at my expense and your benefit. I have never been unreasonable in my edits. Look at the Austrian School talk page. Skomorokh's edits were excellent and after seeing he wasn't another narrow-minded mainstream zealot I immediately encouraged him to keep editing, and to delete anything of mine that was (in his view) poorly written. Not the actions of a deranged psychopath on a power trip. The quality of the articles is everything to me. I keep a low profile, but I know my stuff (unlike JQ, LK, Carol and many others who have been fiddling in their respective areas of "expertise" while Rome BURNS).

Many articles I mainly contributed to are now number 1 on google search and are stable because they were scholarly and well written. Unlike Carol's and LK's and JQ's and Gregalton's meandering tortured prose. I ask you to think deeply about this request. I react badly to being treated badly. I react reasonably to be being treated reasonably. Treat me like an animal and you will only feed the beast. I will not change until my last dying breath. I hope you will.