User talk:Madawaskaboy


 * }

April 2012
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 714-X. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:52, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Personal
Re your message: The links to Quackwatch were not added by Stephen Barrett as far as I can tell. The links and references were added when the article was first written in 2007. If you have an issue with the inclusion of certain references or links, please discuss the matter on the talk page. Before you continue to edit medical related articles, I recommend that you review Wikipedia's guideline for identifying medical reliable sources. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:24, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

That's my point. Who gets to decide what medical resources are reliable anyway? Nobody has the right to tell anybody else what they should or should not consider as medical treatment. Quackwatchers think they have that right! They don't! They are not gods. They are big pharma shrills.