User talk:Madden09

August 2008
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Google showed zero results for any kind of film like this. Wikipedia isn't for made-up articles.  We have plenty of articles about real films. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 23:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Dont take it bad but later on this film will be announced to the public ok there will be bulletins, forums and websites and official myspace pages later on ok about this movie this movie has just been announced ok we are writing scripts already for it and the official release date is sometime in 2009. I have some links that have just been started for this movie and the official myspace page. The official myspace page already has over a million myspace views. In less than 20 min.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rider Strong, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rider Strong was changed by Madden09 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-08-15T02:45:17+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Route 666 (2009 Film)
I have nominated Route 666 (2009 Film), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Route 666 (2009 Film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ... disco spinster   talk  02:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC) Hello why do you feel this should be deleted I dont know this should be in the search engines soon.
 * Please see Articles for deletion/Route 666 (2009 Film) for my reasoning. ...  disco spinster   talk  02:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William Herrada
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article William Herrada, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ... disco spinster   talk  02:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Route 666 (2009 Film) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/route666themovie). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 03:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC) I accept there is one thing you can do for me if you want. --Madden09 (talk) 03:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of William Herrada
I have nominated William Herrada, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/William Herrada. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ... disco spinster   talk  03:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Route 666 (2009 Film)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Route 666 (2009 Film), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Pirate Argh!!1! 03:33, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of William Herrada
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as William Herrada, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Pirate Argh!!1! 03:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Route 666 (2009 Film)
Hello why is it being deleted? This is a real film there are myspaces for this, facebooks, it will be in the imdb later on this week. we have are webmaster doing are website www.route666themovie.com --Madden09 (talk) 03:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rachel Sterling
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rachel Sterling, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Deor (talk) 05:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rachel Sterling
A tag has been placed on Rachel Sterling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --EEMIV (talk) 05:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Route 666 (2009 Film)
I have deleted this article again. Do not repost it.  caknuck °  is not used to being the voice of reason  06:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Route 666 (2009 film)
A tag has been placed on Route 666 (2009 film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. H2H (talk) 06:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Last warning
If you continue to recreate the article, this account may be temporarily blocked from editing. Keegan talk 06:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't do this again
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Deor (talk) 07:06, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
This account has been indefinitely blocked for recreating deleted material dispite warnings, and for sockpuppetting. Keegan talk 07:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC)