User talk:Maddox121

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ~Matticus TC 22:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

"Big" Robert Collins
A tag has been placed on "Big" Robert Collins, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template  to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fan-1967 22:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

You have recently re-created the article "Big" Robert Collins, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review.

He's still not "world famous". DO NOT create the article again. Fan-1967 22:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We don't know if someday he'll be a famous politician, or a famous axe-murder, or a mechanic at a garage. Today, he's an unknown teenager, and doesn't meet our standards. We get hundreds of these a day, and many claim the kid will be famous someday. Here, we wait until they are. Fan-1967 23:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * We have no interest in teenagers who are "local celebrities". Can you find, per our standards, examples where he "has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person"? Times of London? BBC? Magazine articles about him? Books, maybe? Didn't think so.

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fan-1967 23:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Darcy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Darcy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Trfc.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Trfc.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:50, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Robert Collins
A tag has been placed on Robert Collins, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 14:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)