User talk:MadeYourReadThis/Archives/2013/June

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Hawaiian Airlines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Manu, Ou, Kolea and 'Amakihi


 * Manaiakalani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Māui

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

brief article on Ella Wesner submitted
RadioFan,

I am resubmitting the Ella Wesner entry with small emendations. Wesner was one of the three most celebrated, notorious, and popular American "male impersonators" of the Gilded Age, a category of entertainer that is largely ignored in historical study of the era, particularly in popular culture. I have no particular stake in this entry-- I am a 62-yeear-old heterosexual-- but the fluidity of gender roles in earlier times I think is a topic that Wesner illustrates well. I have, of course, numerous primary entries from newspapers and journals about her, but I didn't think such a short entry deserved over-citation. Pbhales (talk) 21:21, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

AFC Reflinks tool
I see you asked the author of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hong Kong Venture Capital & Private Equity Association to improve his reference style. In the "reviewer tools" section of the beige (pending), blue (under review), and purple (draft) AFC submission boxes, there is a tool called "Reflinks." This will convert bare URLs into nice pretty "web site"-style citations. I already ran it on the above submission. By the way, the same submitter sent in Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David G Pierce. I posted a note on the Hong Kong submission referring him to my comments on the Pierce submission, as many of the comments I made on the Pierce page apply to the Hong Kong page as well. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  01:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Hi RadioFan. I wanted to let you know that I created an article of a previous Redir you made in 2011. Please look it over if you have time. It's really just a stub now but Gwynne Shotwell is rather notable now and clearly warrants her own article per standard notability and BLP criteria. Cheers. N2e (talk) 05:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC) N2e (talk) 05:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard Reicheg
Hello, I'm hoping to get the following page published in some acceptable form. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard Reicheg Apparently it is deficient. Can I get some clarity on how I can correct it? Is the content of page too simple? Is the content of the page not display enough "noteworthyness" Do the citations need to be improved? Can I get some more specific advice on how the page content and/or citations can be improved Thanks. 209.112.98.248 (talk) 00:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The brevity of the article isn't a big problem, most articles start out that way. The problem is in the notability of this subject.  The references you've provided dont demonstrate that this person meets WP:BIO.  Please click on that link and read over the guidelines there for more information on expectations.--RadioFan (talk) 00:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Great. Thank you very much. We are making progress. I think I understand your goal. Let me ask my question this way. If my cited references were to better demonstrate what I'm  saying in the existing content of the page, would that be enough? In other words, if I added further references and perhaps chose better references, would it also be necessary to change the content of the page?

Or is it BOTH the body of the page AND the references that are insufficient? If BOTH, then would it help for me to add a catalog of his other work through his career?

Thanks for your help.

Rrpjr1 (talk) 02:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Excimer lamp
Hello, I've already added the citations to the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Excimer lamp. It seems to me that now the article become really better. Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.44.216.18 (talk) 13:32, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletion - Chernobil Que Cuchitril!
I'm found this artcle write for me is nominated by deletion, why?. The page has references, although they're in Spanish, that should'nt be a problem (the article is about a Spanish Comic). Perhaps is bad writted (my English level isn't well as i wish), but you can help to make better. What fails has the article?. --Ravave (talk) 11:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello, you don't answer to me. Yesterday, when i read your message, i was adding more references at article. Can i remove the template. I'm waiting your response. --Ravave (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Prodding a article twice with 4000 citations!
It will be better if you refrain from proding an article twice (policy do not allow that) and at least Googling to find relevant sources. Otherwise it seems very concerning to me. Thank you. The Legend  of Zorro  04:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm Ï¿½. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Niwaka Ame ni Mo Makezu without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ï¿½ (talk) 17:21, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Files missing description details
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as: are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Cheerwine.jpg
 * File:Larkmissile.png
 * File:BellagioChineseNewYearDragon.JPG
 * File:Paris las vegas boulevard interior.JPG
 * File:Flamingo - Ballys - Paris Las Vegas.JPG
 * File:Paris Las Vegas interior.JPG
 * File:Bell 30 A19650240000.jpg
 * File:N106US nose damage.JPG

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: File:KANS Logo 2.gif
Hello RadioFan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:KANS Logo 2.gif, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: File is not in the same format (gif vs jpg). Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Cheerwine.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Cheerwine.jpg

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Files missing description details
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as: are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Cheerwine.jpg
 * File:Larkmissile.png
 * File:BellagioChineseNewYearDragon.JPG
 * File:Paris las vegas boulevard interior.JPG
 * File:Flamingo - Ballys - Paris Las Vegas.JPG
 * File:Paris Las Vegas interior.JPG
 * File:Bell 30 A19650240000.jpg
 * File:N106US nose damage.JPG

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victor_Gichun/sandbox
Hi RadioFan You declined the submission of this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victor_Gichun/sandbox because: "Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject."

These citations to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject: ''http://www.aloha-system.com/blogs_m/intervyu-s-viktorom-gichunom-osnovatelem-proekta-atilekt-344.html http://www.atilekt.ru/about/about/sysday.html http://www.cmsmagazine.ru/dialogue/interview/atilekt/ http://www.videosostav.ru/video/47732ebad11cbdc286f02707b8a83af4 http://2008.tagline.ru/rezultati/oborot.html http://internet.cnews.ru/news/line/index.shtml?2010/04/27/388446 http://vieru.md/2011/04/poleznye-knigi-po-it-biznesu/ http://2011.tagline.ru/personalities/ http://goldensite.ru/ej.aspx http://www.atilekt.ru/about/about/intriga.html http://www.atilekt.ru/about/about/ntv.html''

And all they are independent and at the bottom of the article in sections Interview for magazines, TV interview and References

I have no any references to my activity. This is all I have.

I read all articles on wikipedia about citations, references and still don't understand what should I do to submit the article?

Please help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor Gichun (talk • contribs) 20:28, 30 June 2013 (UTC)