User talk:Madeeswer

Ignitemindz
Hi, thanks for message. Note that the article title was as above, although in the article it was spelt "IgniteMindZ". The procedure for adding articles is the same as anything else, except that articles about companies are like to be scrutinised more closely because of the risk of promotional intent.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  10:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines for companies. You have no independent references, they are all to the company itself. You tell us nothing about the company (number of staff, turnover, profit), just that it is less than one year old, has one (!) corporate client, and a yet-to-be-launched new product. It looks like a new small business, and therefore not notable.
 * Training sessions conducted on IgniteMindZ are fully hands on oriented. Each and every participants will be provided with a system in their desk &mdash; this looks as if you are promoting a service. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * Judging by your username, you may have a conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.