User talk:Madeilyn

January 2019
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 09:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex
Hi there. Your changes all seem a little disruptive, please stop this pattern or risk a block. If you want to make this change again, please ask for support on the talkpage. Thanks Govindaharihari (talk) 16:57, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, you may be blocked from editing. ''https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prince_Harry,_Duke_of_Sussex&diff=prev&oldid=876605338 - this edit that you made is pure vandalism, please stop or you will be blocked. Thanks '' Govindaharihari (talk) 16:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Aoi (青い) (talk) 04:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Similarly at Prince William, Duke of Cambridge. You need to read the edit summaries in the article history to understand why your edits are being reverted. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:55, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm Samee. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Sridevi, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! samee converse  08:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 22:25, 2 March 2019 (UTC)