User talk:Madelinerice/sandbox

Article Evaluation Talk:2014 Las Vegas shootings

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? nothing distracted me from this article, everything was relevant to the topics and the events leading up to it.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? The dates are accurate as well as the times are accurate

What else could be improved? I would try and leave personal information out of this article, giving it a more factual foundation. People are coming on here to read this and become educated on this event, but it is full of commentary.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is very neutral, there aren't claims in here that are heavily bias, it is very factual and informational.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? underrepresented- victims/tribute

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? the links all work, and do support the topic. They give more information than the article itself.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? There aren't really any facts to be cited since it is mostly commentary and personal opinions. Everything looks cited that needs to be.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? 'Too disgusted at the moment to edit this'- feel like this is off topic, yes this is a very harsh topic, but this is personal and not factual. That was a distractor from the information needed. Robert Wilcox section, the information was very bland, apparently was used a lot, nothing was guaranteed. Not good information. a lot of this article was personal opinions and objectified, this should be factual and to the point. As I read I was very distracted by many things, mostly personal opinions and thoughts.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? the article is rated as a c class, it is a part of WikiProjects

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? We talk about events like this in class as a factual topic, as to the motives and how the occur and why they occur. The article very much so matched up with how we discuss and analyze harsh events like this, but the talk page focused more on the commentary and personal opinion aspects, as in class we only touch on personal opinions a little.

Madelinerice (talk) 16:34, 26 September 2018 (UTC)why is there not a tribute to the victims in this article? with most attacks like these we honor the victims and send remorse to them.Madelinerice (talk) 16:34, 26 September 2018 (UTC)