User talk:Madhanraju2014

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Vijay Eswaran. Grayfell (talk) 20:24, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Vijay Eswaran could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 20:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I just wanted to make you aware of the specific ways that your edits and behavior are in violation of Wikipedia policy.


 * Editing with a conflict of interest is generally discouraged. Because you claim to be a representative of the subject of the article you are editing, you should immediately cease editing this article, especially as you appear to be trying to purge it of any negative material about the subject. If you have problems with the article's content, please leave a message on the article's talk page listing your specific concerns.
 * Article content must be verifiable, and even negative information about a subject is permitted if it is relevant and verifiable. Removing content critical of the subject simply because the subject does not want it published is not acceptable.
 * You may not have outstanding threats to take legal action against Wikipedia editors and continue to edit Wikipedia.

If you want the block on your account removed, you will need to demonstrate to an administrator that:


 * You have withdrawn all threats of legal action against Wikipedia editors.
 * You understand that you may not remove sourced critical content from Wikipedia just because your employer does not like it.
 * You will work with the community to improve the article, even if this means leaving all or some of the critical information in the article. Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy describes what kind of negative content is permitted. If content on the page contradicts this policy, it could be removed -- but you should still request that others remove the content due to your conflict of interest.

--Chris (talk) 22:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 10:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Madhanraju2014. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 16:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 09:01, 27 April 2019 (UTC)