User talk:Madhero88


 * Messages



Mind maps
I have a few concerns about the mind maps. Lets discuss further at WP:MED. Started here  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 18:50, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry...
I'm sorry but ... I wasn't vandalizing his page. I was only trying to make conversation. -- ''Rhain1999 contributions talk 20:38, 1 April 2011 (EST)
 * Sorry but i didnt understand the message and I can see it is relating to any article that is why i reverted it, and since you are already warned, that made the comment more suspicious, If I am mistaking am sorry M aen K. A.  Talk  12:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Regarding my Recent Edit
You've got to admit, renaming the caption of a photo "Fart Dragon" was pretty funny. I know you're laughing, even if you give me my final warning as you do it. There has to be some edits that are somewhat humorous to you. After all, you are human... I'm not doing it all to be destructive, but it is cool to see the article with different captions on it (like Fart Dragon). I'm sorry if I have offended you and will make every effort to keep from making disruptive edits in the future. Thank you for giving me my warnings, you're a pretty cool police man. (hey 16:59, 26 November 2011 (UTC))

~Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristopherCollinsII (talk • contribs) 16:59, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

History sections
In an article like asthma, I think it would be better if you based the content on secondary sources rather than articles that you have found in the BMJ's online archive. Could I persuade you to discuss your additions on Talk:Asthma? JFW &#124; T@lk  16:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)


 * The situation might be slightly different in rare conditions, where there may not be sufficient secondary sources to support a "history" section. This is a conundrum I faced in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and thyrotoxic periodic paralysis. JFW &#124; T@lk  16:31, 4 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I see, there is very few secondary sources too, I looked it over and over, I am actually trying to look for landmarks in the history of the research about asthma, thats why you find that some information is not applicable to today's medicine, as the current understanding of the disease was mostly understood in the 60's and later. please suggest any sources to help expanding the article M aen K. A.  Talk  16:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

marshall syndrome
Why did you create a page at wikipedia about the marshall syndrome?\

Greetz Tessa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.208.203.173 (talk) 15:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

File:ECGcolor.svg copyrights
Hi,

I have concerns about this image and its usage in the EKG article. The image is vectorized directly from the Book 'The Only EKG Book You'll Ever Need 6th Edition' page 38, thus it is certainly not a public domain image. The image should be replaced with free (and also better) image. --Jptvie (talk) 12:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MULOGO00213.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:MULOGO00213.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Nina photo question
Hi,

I believe you took the photo of the Nina replica on the Wiki. Corpus Christi entry?

I'm interested in nautical history. We will be in Corpus this coming weekend.

Do you know if that replica is a museum ship there in the marina still today? Or was it just visiting there and is now gone?

Thank you.

-Clifton Bencke Promoting youth and families getting outdoors more with nature at... PiratesAndParrots.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by CliftonBencke (talk • contribs) 13:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Borders of the lung merger
Hi, I'm proposing to merge the anatomy articles Posterior border of lung, Anterior border of lung, and Inferior border of lung into one article: Borders of the lung. There's no consensus on the issue, and since it is supported by the Pulmonology task force, I was wondering if you could add your opinion at the merger discussion here: Talk:Borders of the lung.

Thanks, K e rowyn Leave a note 21:42, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

File:ConductionsystemoftheheartwithoutHeart.svg
Hi! We've updated the File:ConductionsystemoftheheartwithoutHeart.svg. Could You check its english summary (maybe You're able to check german one, too?) and – if it's good – switch the File:ConductionsystemoftheheartwithouttheHeart.png to File:ConductionsystemoftheheartwithoutHeart.svg in these articles? Please, tell me, what's Your opinion. (I'll be pleased if You answer on my pl.wiki) Vinne2 (talk) 08:38, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Hindu Religious Discourses for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hindu Religious Discourses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu Religious Discourses until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Breaking Bad
Just a question. How can you consider spam something that was made to promote a show? Just curious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wayhopegoes (talk • contribs) 21:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Mahmoud Al-Sheyyab.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mahmoud Al-Sheyyab.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:42, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AAAUlogo.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:AAAUlogo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:18, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:35, 30 October 2011 (UTC).

User talk:Madhero88/Documentation
I'm not entirely sure what User talk:Madhero88/Documentation is...but I guess it is something directed toward you?  Chzz  ► 01:03, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for notifying me about that. I have no Idea what is that all about, but as you said this page belongs to me. should I do something?? M aen K. A.  Talk  10:08, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I really don't know; I only noticed it, because I've been trying to help that user on User_talk:KnowLimits. I'm not sure what they're asking about.  Chzz  ► 10:12, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries, please notify me if i need to do anything about it M aen K. A.  Talk  10:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

National Museums of Scotland
Thanks for your comments. I wasn't aware that one shouldn't copy and paste. However, I am unable to move the page in question (from National Museums of Scotland to National Museums Scotland) because the latter page exists (with on a forward to the former). Because the former page exists, it is not possible to move to latter to the same name. As the name of the organisation changed five years ago, Wikipedia should accurately reflect this, which it currently does not.

I would appreciate your guidance as to how to achive this move. Is it possible to delete the National Museums Scotland page, so that the National Museums of Scotland page can be moved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tizard99 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 26 November 2011 (UTC) Tizard99 (talk) 17:05, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks for the barnstar and the kind message! You too should definitely be appreciated 100 times more than you are currently appreciated. Keep up the good work. JFW &#124; T@lk  18:00, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your appreciation :) M aen K. A.  Talk  16:05, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

needing someone to help me with wiki
hi there :) I hope you dont mind me posting here as well as I just emailed you.. but just thought I'd let you know I have and I also wanted to see where this posts ends up...whether it ends up on the bottom of your page or not (appoliges if it dont).

Anyway.. looking forward to seeing your response to the email ive sent and if you are interested in helping me set up a page. (I do also have a medical interest in other things other then the page Im wanting help with too.. if I could figure out the wiki better.. maybe I then could help out at this site with edits for other medical conditions too).

Tania — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taniaaust1 (talk • contribs) 05:20, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello... First of all you are so welcome to wikipedia... second am ready to offer any help you might want.. especially if related to medical articles or your user page. am sorry but i didnt get your email, can you please send it again or just tell me what you want on my talk page??. Again welcome to wikipedia :) M aen K. A.  Talk  16:04, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

in response to your message to mine
Hi :) thank you for the wiki welcome.

I just earlier today after I'd emailed you using the madhero88 at gmail address mentioned (not sure why it didnt get to you)...but I ended up finding the live chat and got some help so now the new page is up and being done.

I thought you may of been interested I noticed you'd done essential hypertension. The new page is on "Orthostatic Hypertension" which is a bit tricky as there is hardly much online about the condition and some of my knowledge comes from medical specialists on the disorder.

I currently dont have any questions to ask you, due to getting a lot of advice on working wiki today but bound to have more in future as Im just learning. :)

Feel welcome to contribute to the new page if you want. Ive put all the info onto it so far with others fixing my wiki mistakes.. within the next couple of days I'll be adding more references as some of the things Ive said that I know are factual but havent yet had time to find the references for. If you have a medical knowledge maybe you can put down one of the main theories of thought of how the condition actually occurs as Im going to really struggle with that. (I struggle to get my head around that the theory of pressor reflexes over compensating).

edit addition. I just got stuck doing the page. I dont know where that straight downward slash is on my computer for doing reference formating, so half my references work with / but the other half dont (another ending up fixing the others for me). If you are bored, there is a messed up reference format currently that I cant fix myself in the treatment section I just started at the new page "orthostatic hypertension" Thanks if you get to it before anyone else does.

Taniaaust1 (talk)taniaaust1Taniaaust1 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC).

Hi again. I forgot to leave my email address its taniaaust1 at hotmail, I know now how to get my messages at wiki.

I are running into some more issues with the Orthostatic Hypertension page now. Someone complained it was looking like a medical journal article so I guess it needs to be made more looking encyclopedic (I've put some things on it in lists as that was the clearest way I could think to put them in eg list of symptoms, maybe that is all adding to it looking like a medical journal article?).

Also thou references for almost all the things Ive said Ive found now and put on the page, some of the things Ive put down appear to be unreferenced as I dont know what to do when the same reference source references several different things mentioned on the page, in different places on the page (so that is leaving me with just putting it by one of those things, with the others things appearing to unreferenced when in fact they have got supporting reference but its elsewhere on the page).

Thanks for your offer to help. Lets see if I can sign my name at the bottom of this correctly today.

taniaaust1Taniaaust1 (talk) 06:11, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Kawasaki disease (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links to Colon, Circulation, Iliac arteries, Cerebral and Chorea


 * Leukodystrophy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link to Caudate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

User talk:41.185.101.242
Hi,

Thanks for the welcome... but i'm almost a regular & I'd actually just forgotten to log in to Wikipedia.... sorry

&amp;Brew 12:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hi. Thanks for your willingness to rewrite the article. Unfortunately, we can't host the content even temporarily in userspace. All material on any page in Wikipedia must comply with our copyright policies. Please review Copy-paste.

I see at a glance that the lead paragraph as placed in your sandbox still copies the source article at Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology:

Source:

Beyond actual copying, there is very close paraphrasing of the source such that we could not use:

Source:

(I also have to ask if you have actually checked the sources in this article yourself; if you have not, but are citing to them based on their usage in the paper from which you copied, I'm afraid this is also an issue of Plagiarism, although the copyright concerns are my area.)

Content has also been copied from at least one other source:

Source:

and.

Your sandbox has been blanked and listed at the copyright problems board. Please rewrite the article from scratch, in compliance with our copyright policies. You may used brief and clearly marked quotations, accurately cited to the source you used, but you cannot copy content from copyrighted documents otherwise. If the article is not rewritten at that space within a week, it is likely to be deleted. (If you are actually the copyright holder of these articles, the procedure for verifying that is set out on the template blanking your sandbox. You can also read about it at Donating copyrighted materials.)

Please let us know if you have created other articles by copying or closely paraphrasing content from your sources. If the sources are non-free, the content will need to be rewritten.

If you have any questions about the procedures or policies, please feel free to come by my talk page. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:27, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the information, and I ll work again on the article M aen K. A.  Talk  14:41, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Please take a look at this, is this how u want me to do? just to change the phrases and words? M aen K. A.  Talk  14:46, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I have a pretty good idea what's required. I've been out all day but should have some time in about 12 hours. If you like, I'll have a look at what you've done then and can help with the rewrite. I'll check back then. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 15:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Good, I welcome some help, thank you M aen K. A.  Talk  15:17, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I can't spend any time on it today, either. Just some thoughts for now:
 * I had a quick look at the Google Book search results for ''celiac crisis" and "coeliac crisis" and found a couple of recent-ish textbooks with descriptions of the thing. It may be simpler (for you and for readers wanting to verify the article) to base the article on a couple of those textbooks, provided they say what's necessary. If you can reduce the number of references to a handful of textbooks, it's much easier to read and verify, and satisfies WP:MEDMOS per its preference for secondary sources.
 * Our article must be entirely different from its sources in terms of language used and organisation (sequence, layout, logical progression). I'll talk to you tomorrow. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:37, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for dropping the ball on this, and everything else lately. I've been a bit under the weather but am on the mend. When I next get to the med library I'll pull out what they have on the topic and maybe put something to you. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 02:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

benign hypertension
Thanks for the welcome. I have had a go at the stub on benign hypertension. Would appreciate comments. adh (talk) 11:14, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

resource request
Hi,

I've uploaded the three articles you requested on the resource exchange. You can find links to the articles on that page. Best, GabrielF (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you so so much for providing those M aen K. A.  Talk  09:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

resource request
OK I've responded to your latest resource request. GabrielF (talk) 21:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I've done another batch for you. GabrielF (talk) 19:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

resource request 10 January
Hi,

I've uploaded one of the articles that you requested at the resource exchange. You can find a link to the article at that page. GabrielF (talk) 23:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you M aen K. A.  Talk  22:41, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!
SarahStierch (talk) 22:09, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Mypic2333.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mypic2333.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

MOTDs (This space for rent)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 11:42, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

citing signs
Can a poster or sign post be cited as a source? The one in question was put up by the council and gives a brief history of the village of Rougham.Joshden (talk) 17:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages
Dear Author/Madhero88

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at the University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Leukodystrophy. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article and or other health-related articles. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please reply via my talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance.Hydra Rain (talk) 15:35, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Adopt-a-user
Hi Madhero88. I'm leaving you this message because you have previously been involved as an adopter with Wikipedia's Adopt-a-user program. A clean-up of this program is currently underway, and as part of the process I am trying to find out who is and isn't still interested in remaining an adopter.

If you would prefer not to be part of the adoption program anymore, you need do nothing; when the overhaul of the project is completed your name will be removed from the list of active adopters. However, if you have current adoptees, an active adoption school or an interest in adopting in the near future, then please let us know by signing here.

If you want to remain in the project and can currently take on more adoptees, there is a serious backlog at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user; it would be enormously helpful if you could take on one or two of the users there. Please do keep an eye on the project for upcoming changes, we could use your opinions and your help! Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 09:09, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

spder man nda
wrong englsh bro!!! revert bac to what dd!!! have the orgmanl; copy o f th e comc dude!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.161.120.161 (talk) 06:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiMedicine
Hi I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page. Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders. Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 06:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for informing me, sure I am interested to be involved M aen K. A.  Talk  18:28, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Bronchitis Peer Review Request
Hi Madhero88, I saw that you're a member of the pulmonology task force with special interest in COPD so I would like to ask you if you would be willing to peer review the Bronchitis article. I've listed it on the peer review page as well. Let me know here or on my talk page. Thanks! TylerDurden8823 (talk) 04:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration. Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 20:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
 * Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
 * If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Vital Articles
To all editors displaying the "Vital Articles" template on their User Page.

Hi,

I recently tried to make a change to the list of Level 3 Vital Articles by replacing the entry

with a new replacement article

Although I have advertised the proposed change on Wikipedia talk:Vital articles, I had no response and an anonymous IP editor took it upon himself to undo my changes on grounds that my proposal did not have a "strong consensus".

Will you please look at the discussion Wikipedia talk:Vital articles and add your opinion.

Martinvl (talk) 20:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Your free Cochrane account is on its way!
Please fill out this very short form to receive your free access to Cochrane Collaboration's library of medical reviews: Link to form.

If you have any questions, just ask me. Cheers, Ocaasi 13:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:50, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

Feedback: manual vacuum aspiration
Love your work, please keep it up.

Your image for a vacuum aspiration has a few problems. I want to apologize -- I have a vague memory of bringing this up with somebody on Wikipedia years ago, then not following through for some real-world reason. If that was you, and I wasted your time, I apologize.

The uterus in your image appears in a relaxed position. Typically, a tenaculum is used to pull the cervix forward and make it as straight a shot as possible from the vaginal introitus to the fundus, because cannulae for suction aspirators do not bend as much as the one in your image.

I can't figure out what is holding the vagina open in your image; a regular speculum is typically used, and it typically holds the vagina much more open than that, because you need to have line of sight, a tenaculum, and a cannula all in there. It also extends all the way to the cervix -- often past the cervix, once the cervix is pulled forward with the tenaculum.

The weight of the speculum and tension of the tenaculum typically make the angle of the vaginal canal a bit more horizontal than you have depicted.

Finally, the aspirator is typically held like a pencil, not like a dagger. This makes it easier to not perforate the fundus, and is good surgical technique in general. The hand position in your illustration makes me wonder where the surgeon is standing!

I wish I could point you to a perfect image, but the Internet is short on those, and searching for abortion images that aren't heavily pro-life is very difficult. I found some that are 90%.

This depicts an MVA:

I think they've exaggerated the size of the uterus and fetus, and I can't tell where the tenaculum is placed -- it typically grasps the cervix horizontally at 11 and 1 or so; some place it vertically at noon but this can make the external os crowded.

This image also suffers from "short speculum syndrome." For reasons I don't understand, about half of all cross-sectional images of vaginas with speculums in them appear to have really short speculums.

This depicts an EVA:

Gestational age isn't listed, so no comment on uterine and fetal size. Clearly the image of the fetus is designed to provoke an emotional response.

Otherwise, this image is great. The surgeon is holding the EVA wrong (pencil grip again), speculum's a little short, and the tenaculum's crux is closer to the tip than I'm used to seeing.

I hope that this feedback is helpful! Again, love your work.

Triacylglyceride (talk) 06:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014
Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * This message has been sent by p joe f on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014
The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the User WPMed template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.

BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors
Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Medical Translation Newsletter Aug./Sept. 2014
Medical Translation Newsletter

Issue 2, Aug./Sept. 2014 by CFCF sign up for monthly delivery 

Feature – Ebola articles
During August we have translated Disease and it is now live in more than 60 different languages! To help us focus on African languages Rubric has donated a large number of articles in languages we haven't previously reached–so a shout out them, and Ian Henderson from Rubric who's joined us here at Wikipedia. We're very happy for our continued collaboration with both Rubric and Translators without Borders!
 * Just some of our over 60 translations:


 * Xhosa
 * Northern Sotho
 * Zulu
 * Tsonga
 * Venda
 * Hausa
 * Igbo
 * Yoruba
 * Kinyarwanda
 * Swahili
 * Tigrinya

At Wikimania there were so many enthusiastic people jumping at the chance to help out the Medical Translation Project, but unfortunately not all of them knew how to get started. That is why we've been spending considerable time writing and improving guides! They are finally live, and you can find them at our home-page! We're proud to announce a new sign up page at WP:MTSIGNUP! The old page was getting cluttered and didn't allow you to speficy a role. The new page should be easier to sign up to, and easier to navigate so that we can reach you when you're needed! Translations are of both full articles and shorter articles continues. The process where short articles are chosen for translation hasn't been fully transparent. In the coming months we hope to have a first guide, so that anyone who writes medical or health articles knows how to get their articles to a standard where they can be translated! That's why we're currently working on medical good lede criteria! The idea is to have a similar peer review process to good article nominations, but only for ledes. -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 13:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * New roles and guides!
 * New sign up page!
 * Style guides for translations
 * Some more stats
 * In July, 18 full article translations went live ( WP:RTT ), and an additional 6 simplified versions went live ( WP:RTTS )!
 * We have a number of new lead integrators into Dutch, Polish, Arabic and Bulgarian, with more to come in smaller languages! ( Find them here old sign up page )
 * We were mentioned in a Global Voices Online report by Subhashish Panigrahi at Doctors and translators are working together to bridge Wikipedia's medical language gap
 * New medical professionals have started, dedicated to working in Odiya and Kinyarwanda!
 * Further reading
 * Translators Without Borders
 * Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

Would it be possible to create a middle-east map with a standard grey background?
I was wondering whether it would be possible to create an alternate middle-east map to as a replacement for File:MiddleEast blacky.svg. I don't know how it came about but the black is politically loaded. It is used in locations such as Portal:Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant and Portal:Middle_East. Would it be possible that you could create a replacement grey version? many thanks. Gregkaye ✍ ♪  11:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Geometry of landforms maps
HI.

I gather you are capable of creating maps. Can you make a few for me. Example Africa as an ellipse. On a globe Africa is an almost perfect ellipse, is it possible to draw it for use online?

Also I want a map containing Australia nested on North America which is nested on top of Asia/Europe/Africa.

Here is something that might whet your appetite: On a globe of approximately 12” diameter, a disc of approximately two and three quarter inches, will cover about 13 degrees. (All dimensions are very approximate and so are the positions inferred below.)

Centred in the Tasman Sea (according to the globe, at the centre of the gyre of that sea) the disc will describe the west coast of New Zealand and Tasmania cutting Australia at Melbourne and Rockhampton.

It will cut the west coast of Australia, if centred near Ayre's Rock but leave out as much land to the south as sea it includes to the north. The two arcs are joined by the same arc with the disc centred where all the storms seem to have focussed in the South Australian Basin recently -and describe the west coast of Tasmania again, cutting through a lot of towns on the south Australian coast from Adelaide to Albany, -following what I can only presume is the low tide mark of the Great Australian Bight.

Centred on the coast of what used to be called New Guinea (at the end of the Maoka or Ma Oke? Mountains on the Gulf of Sarera) the disc covers one side of the coast of the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf, runs south of Arnheim Land and cuts the Gulf of Carpenteria at a point where a chain of islands run out to Mornington Island; a point where the centre of that same disc would describe the north coast of PNG.

Centred somewhere in the Lake Ayre complex (somewhere near the source? (or mouth*) Of Cooper's Creek) it describes the East coast of Australia.


 * Lake Ayer is the low point in the Australian depression. All the creeks lead into it, I imagine. Of course when the wet is in full spate I imagine it could well work in reverse. Perhaps someone could enlighten me?

The same arc appears all along the Asian coastline. It will describe the Gulf of Tonkin for example, the west coast of the Philippines and quite a lot of the southern edge of the Indonesian Archipelago.

More?

Try out a 60 degree arc over the Pacific and North America. There are a particularly nice set encompassing the Rockies and the Aleutians and another set centred on the land between the greatest tidal ranges in the world and the Icelandic Low.

15 degrees off Africa in the SE Atlantic Basin and one of 17 degrees excribing the lakes in SE Africa, cutting the ends of Ethiopia and Madagascar and describing the Seychelles Ridge through Reunion and Port Louis.

Thanks in advance for any help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weatherlawyer (talk • contribs) 16:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/SuperHamster — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.183.173.192 (talk) 20:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manaseer Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JOD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Manaseer Group at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Royal Hashemite Court, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Security services. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

mind maps
Hi Madhero,

I was interested in using your mind maps of the limb musculature for a class I am teaching for med students, but I would like a vector diagram to correct some typos and make summaries on the image. Please let me know whether this is possible.

Thanks.

Vipatron (talk) 18:14, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Vipatron

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Medicine/to do
WikiProject Medicine/to do, a page which created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/to do and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Medicine/to do during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 03:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Medicine/Google Project
WikiProject Medicine/Google Project, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Google Project and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Medicine/Google Project during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Barbara (WVS) (talk) 21:45, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 00:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)please ping me

Speedy deletion nomination of The Royal Hashemite Court


A tag has been placed on The Royal Hashemite Court requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.rhc.jo/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 2003:71:EF0B:9E0:7896:9F9F:3FE5:9454 (talk) 19:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Careem, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Multinational and Magnus Olsson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Uber (company)
I reverted your edit to Uber (company). Although Careem may indeed be the Uber of the Middle-East, there are a hundred similar companies across the world and the article got much too long once we started listing each and every one. If you disagree with my removal, I'm very happy to discuss it with you. --Yamla (talk) 20:44, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Quadrants
Template:Quadrants has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rami Shaheen


A tag has been placed on Rami Shaheen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shirt58 (talk) 11:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ammar Mango


A tag has been placed on Ammar Mango, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Randykitty (talk) 15:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bitetv22.svg
Thank you for uploading File:Bitetv22.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Membership renewal


You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2020.

Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Whipworm egg2.png


The file File:Whipworm egg2.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:QuadrantsIMAGE
Template:QuadrantsIMAGE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TheImaCow (talk) 08:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Small blue round cell tumors
Template:Small blue round cell tumors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Membership renewal


You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2022.

Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk), 2021.01

Orphaned non-free image File:Smack my crack.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Smack my crack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:JordanGoldenMedalpromote
Template:JordanGoldenMedalpromote has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mutah University logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Mutah University logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

"Scleroderma(medicine)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Scleroderma(medicine) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 06:43, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

"Stevens-Johnson-Fuchs-Syndrome" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stevens-Johnson-Fuchs-Syndrome&redirect=no Stevens-Johnson-Fuchs-Syndrome] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 23:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)