User talk:Madhu Pavithran

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Velayudham, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Secret of success (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Vaaranam Aayiram. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Secret of success (talk) 12:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Velayudham, you may be blocked from editing.  Secret of success  ( talk ) 12:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Velayudham. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Secret of success  ( talk ) 06:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Velayudham, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Secret of success  ( talk ) 05:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:45, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Message sent with Global message delivery.

March 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Adding original research to film articles. Per a complaint about your edits at WP:AIV. You have constantly changed articles, but have never left a message on any talk page. This prevents you from working with others to achieve consensus. In the future, please obtain consensus before making controversial changes. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:35, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuation of the same type of disruptive editing that led to your previous block. You have persistently added unsourced and dubious content, with flagrant disregard of the need for consensus, and have edit warred to keep your dubious edits in place, with no attempt to discuss or explain your edits, and no response to any messages. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:16, 31 March 2012 (UTC)