User talk:Madhumanalil

Bhagavathi temples in kerala and Vadasserikavu bhagavathi temple
I cannot understand what you were trying to say in Bhagavathi temples in kerala and Vadasserikavu bhagavathi temple. Please take time to write in a way that others can understand what you are trying to describe. If you want help, the help desk is a good place to ask. Thank you, Steven Walling &bull; talk   00:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Bhagavathi temples in kerala was quite rightly tagged for speedy deletion. But I have taken pity and moved it to User:Madhumanalil/sandbox to give you a chance to convert it into an article. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:46, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vadasserikavu Bhagavathi Temple


The article Vadasserikavu Bhagavathi Temple has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article is incomprehensible and unsourced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steven Walling &bull; talk   01:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thrichittat temple


A tag has been placed on Thrichittat temple, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redalert2fan (talk) 16:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC)