User talk:MadisonOliver7/Hexactinellid/Melvinpritchett Peer Review

There are a few grammatical and structural issues throughout the bolded sentences you've added. I would recommend reading through it again to correct these before publication. Two of the sources are listed as not peer reviewed articles. Maybe there is an article that has the same information you have already found. In one sentence you refer to something as "another species", does the study have the exact name of the species to refer to? The last sentence of the reefs section is a little confusing to read. I think you are trying to say there is potential proof of hexactinellids in the pacific ocean, but it is difficult to decipher. You also mention a species zoantharin but do not further explain if it is a hexactinellid species or not, clarifying might help the ease of reading. "With around 75% of the sponge tissue being fused in this way." is its own sentence in the last section, however, it needs to be attached to the sentence before with a comma. One more sentence will need to be added to replace it. The last section does not have a heading, so I am not sure what the overall topic of it is. The last image added does not have a caption at the bottom of it. Overall, I think all of the sentences add to the specifics and general quality of the article. Different species, new research, and current conservation efforts are all discussed. I think it only needs a few structural and resource changes before publication.

Melvinpritchett (talk) 20:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)