User talk:Madman123456

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 19:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Aix-Marseille University
Do you have more references for your controversy sections? I don't think the sorurces are sufficient for such an allegation. Allegations such as these should have very good wp:reliable sources. I am unfamiliar with the reputation of and this source: https://marsactu.fr/lunite-de-didier-raoult-paradis-de-la-recherche-pour-les-uns-enfer-pour-dautres/ If this is a well-founded issue, there should be many sources. Please see wp:BLP. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Not that such an allegation would surprise me, BTW. Jim1138 (talk) 08:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

here is one more reference. Marsactu is a well estabished local news agency in Marseille. Repeated edits of referenced content is also edit warring.Madman123456 (talk) 17:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring
Repeated replacement of content is wp:edit warring and is strongly discouraged. I strongly urge you to read the previous link. Also, see wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle on how to proceed. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Aix-Marseille University and Didier Raoult
FYI: Discussion on WP:BLPN Jim1138 (talk) 06:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Aix-Marseille University. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Controversy section moved to bottom
I moved the controversy section to the bottom and added your other ref. If you want the content left, you need to engage in the conversation on BLPN. Jim1138 (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

BLPN discussion
Removed per wp:BLPCRIME. Since you have not participated in WP:BLPN (your talk on my page did not address the issues), restoration w/o consensus on that page will result in a ticket being opened on WP:AN3 Jim1138 (talk) 00:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

You were warned
I have requested resolution for your actions on WP:BLPN. Engage if you wish. Jim1138 (talk) 22:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Just an FYI: resolution is often accomplished with wp:blocks and page protection. Is that the outcome you wish? If the event was that significant, why not more publicity rather than just one author on one rag? Jim1138 (talk) 22:32, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * More references the better. Discuss on BLPN link above. Jim1138 (talk) 22:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Didier Raoult. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Topic is being discussed at Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard - please address matter there and readd the material only if consensus is found for addition. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please, please, discuss this on BLPN
You should be discussing this on WP:BLPN Otherwise you will likely find yourself wp:blocked; if it isn't already too late. Wikipedia has extensive policy about how to proceed with issues involving wp:biographies of living persons. Even if you are right, by ignoring the policy, you can be blocked. It happens time and again. It is frustrating for others to put so much time into this. So, please start a discussion and list your references and such to the BLPN link above. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 18:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

COI
Hello, Madman123456. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bueller 007 (talk) 14:43, 18 May 2020 (UTC)