User talk:Madmarshall

Architecture
Please don't start making big changes tht make that article much more complex. It is being maintained in a stable way, and is watched by a number of architectural writers. There is much that can be said, but it will not all fit into that first paragraph. You will notice that it says "disambiguation" near the top, with a link. That link takes you to all the other uses, and avoids messy statements like "as the word is generally used".

As you are a new editor, I should first put up a welcome banner, and then tell you that I am about to revert the edits. Sorry!

When you are dealing with an important article that gets a thousand hits a day, the best way to approach matters is to leave a message on the talk page that says "here is a suggestion". There is heaps of work to do on Wikipedia. My advice is, go and improve and article that 1. Is not well written, 2. is inconsistent, 3. looks messy, 4. is seriously lacking in vital info.

The present article is concise, precise, and consistent. It has been worked on very hard to get it that way. Particularly the introduction.

Amandajm (talk) 09:26, 1 November 2011 (UTC)