User talk:Madmaxc16

February 2009
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 01:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Lake Placid 2‎
Please STOP your repeated attempts to add a bad plot summary to this film article. It is beyond too long (should be 400-700 words at most), contains too much original research and personal opinion, and is not appropriate. Changing from an IP to a user does not negate your continued ignoring of the rejection of this summary and your vandalism of the page. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 01:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 01:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 00:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * A more suitable approach, would be to discuss what you think is wrong with the article, on the article's talk page. I don't see a single message posted by you there.  Dream Focus (talk) 02:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The article is fine when this person isn't vandalizing it (and ignoring both warnings and personal messages). Stalking is a dirty occupation. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 02:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Shark Swarm
A tag has been placed on Shark Swarm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 16:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shark Swarm 2008 (TV)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shark Swarm 2008 (TV), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Unnotable television film - with all copyvio removed, nothing left but a stub

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 16:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''Do not continue to copy/paste materials from other sites in an attempt to use them here. That is against Wikipedia policy. Also, do not continue making the same article over and over again as you have done with the three Shark Swarm articles. It is disruptive and could get you blocked.'' -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 16:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)