User talk:MadonnaPenguin

.

Speedy deletion nomination of Hot cheetos
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja talk  02:20, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC) OK. --PENGDONNA (talk) 18:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Haberdine
A tag has been placed on Haberdine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY  01:07, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
The recent edit you made to the page Haberdine has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ  01:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

I WAS ASKING FOR DELETION. --PENGDONNA (talk) 01:22, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —  Jeff G. ツ  01:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of I Love New York (Madonna song)
I have nominated I Love New York (Madonna song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/I Love New York (Madonna song)&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 19:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of I Love New York (Madonna song)
A tag has been placed on I Love New York (Madonna song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 19:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There's already a discussion on Confessions on a Dance floor where it was decided this song isn't notable enough on its own. That was from 2006. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 19:03, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Keep
What are you doing? I've started a discussion on the talk page, yet you have decided to move the article without talking about the matter. Nev1 (talk) 20:15, 25 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Before you go around creating any more unnecessary redirects, would you mind explaining what you're doing? Nev1 (talk) 20:24, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Keep (word)
A tag has been placed on Keep (word) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kudpung (talk) 20:34, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Editing other-people's comments
Please do not do it. Feel free to add your own comment afterwards, noting mistakes or changes you think are needed, but let his or her comments themselves stand as he or she wrote them. See WP:TALK for standard etiquette guidelines. DMacks (talk) 06:35, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

'''YOU MEAN NOTHING. GOSH, LEARN HOW TO SPELL.''' --PENGDONNA (talk) 13:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)


 * No, DMacks means that this edit to Talk:True Blue (album) was inappropriate; avoid future edits like that, where you change the words of another editor's talk page comment. —C.Fred (talk) 13:47, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

You do not know what I am talking about.

Speedy deletion nomination of Keep (word)
A tag has been placed on Keep (word) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 13:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Typo Team/Members, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 18:26, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as MadonnaPenguin, to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 14:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia Awards, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 13:11, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

You cannot cuss on Wikipedia. Someone has to report it! --PENGDONNA!!!!!!!!! (talk) 13:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTCENSORED. DMacks (talk) 15:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Polite suggestions
Hi. I see you like leaving warnings on editors' talk pages. Perhaps you could also remember to sign you own posts, and to make edit summaries, especially when it could look as if you had been making additions on other editors' user pages.--Kudpung (talk) 02:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Was It a Cat I Saw?
A tag has been placed on Was It a Cat I Saw?, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Moocha (talk) 17:28, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 17:33, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Okay.

Last warning
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Mer Girl, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 04:51, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, you are already blocked. Good. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 04:54, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * No, the block expired. But if user returns to same behavior that led to the block, pretty obvious that a block will be reinstated for a much longer time-period. DMacks (talk) 05:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Please refrain from uploading disruptive images with no encyclopedic value, such as: It could be considered vandalism. Please copmplete all the information  required when uploading  imageshank you. Kudpung (talk) 23:56, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Images900.jpg
 * File:Images9002.jpg
 * File:MadonnaAlbum2.jpg

Don't get blocked again
Hi Penguin. We know you  are a great  fan  of Madonna, but  so  are a lot of other people. The Wikipedia is not a fan club and the articles about  her and her music probably  are sufficient  already  and have enough  pictures. Perhaps you would like to  edit or improve some our our other articles, but  please read how to  do  it  first otherwise you  might  get  blocked again. Thanhks. --Kudpung (talk) 00:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to User:Kudpung. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —  Jeff G. ツ  00:09, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

That was an acsedent, SERIOUSLY!!!!!!!! --PENGDONNA!!!!!!!!! (talk) 00:10, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Images900.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Images900.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:12, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Images9002.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Images9002.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kudpung (talk) 14:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MadonnaAlbum2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:MadonnaAlbum2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kudpung (talk) 15:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 00:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

I don't reallly care if I get blocked. Well, at least I won't take it if I get blocked for over 2 weeks.

Indefinite block
An indef block does not mean that you are permanently blocked forever. However, you have been blocked because in spite of lots or friendly warnings, official warnings, and a short block, it appears that you haven't really read up on the way to contribute to the Wikipedia. This indef block will last for as long as the administrators think it will take for you to familiarise yourself with the rules. This can last several months or even longer. This will give you plenty of time to learn how to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia and make entries that people will appreciate. When you're ready, and not before, ask to be unblocked again, but do remember that more warnings would risk you being blocked permanently without any chance of coming back.--Kudpung (talk) 01:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Oh. Thanks for the information. I think I can already do better, because I am now editing wikia. I don't seem to get any blocks. (Or warnings, for I only got one). —Preceding unsigned comment added by MadonnaPenguin (talk • contribs)
 * You may want to read Standard offer for more advice.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 01:57, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. Thanks for the advice. I am still editing wikia.

When
When will I get unblocked —Preceding unsigned comment added by MadonnaPenguin (talk • contribs)


 * Try to wait six months as WP:Standard offer recommends. After six months, you can come back and ask an admin if you can be unblocked (not through the talk page of course, but through IRC or email). Then if s/he thinks a review is appropriate, s/he can open up an WP:ANI discussion.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 07:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Six months? Augest, September (My birthday),November (Thansgiving), December (Christmas), January (new year), Febuary (LOVE MONTH??????) OMG

I AM GETTING TIRED
IMB;PCK ,E!!! I AM GETTING SO SICK TIRE OF THIS!!!!!!!!!!
 * Please be patient. More such notes on your talk page will only reduce your chances of getting unblocked.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 02:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
I see that your birthday was yesterday. Just dropping by to say "HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.38.236.150 (talk) 22:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. --PENGDONNA!!!!!!!!! (talk) 22:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

UNTITLED
Do I put this on my account? --PENGDONNA!!!!!!!!! (talk) 22:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

"La, la" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La,_la&redirect=no La, la] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris talk! 04:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)