User talk:Mads-madas

The primal therapy article
Hi, I modified your edit to the primal therapy article. I want to include your text in the introduction and like the idea of stating that upfront, however I put it in a different place. Let me know what you think or if you approve.

I also changed the wording from "widely rejected" to "not accepted in the field of psychology". The reason I did this is because I had initially written "rejected" at the top of the criticism section (years ago). However, some other editors suggested that the term was too strong because few psychologists have even paid attention to it, and a very few seem to support it or at least consider it a possibility. I agreed at that time to go along with the wording of "not accepted" rather than "rejected". I'd like to use the same terminology in both places and also adhere to the consensus that was reached at the time. Of course, a consensus at that time is not set in stone and could be revisited now. Still, I'd prefer to leave it with the agreed wording if it makes no difference to you. Twerges (talk) 20:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)


 * That sounds great, thanks for taking the time to go over it. mads (talk) 09:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)