User talk:Maestro.gandhi

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - Mailer Diablo 16:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hello, Maestro.gandhi! I really like your contributions to Wikipedia, especially the recent Symphony No. 2 (Mahler) page. Good job. -- A. Wang (talk/contrb.) 19:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Augmented sixths
Thanks for your note, Maestro. We try!

–&thinsp; Noetica ♬♩&thinsp;Talk 22:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Cadential 6/4 fallacy
Hi, I notice that you chimed in at the Augmented 6th page about the rationality of not referring to the cadential six-four as having a root of C (in the key of C), which, of course, defies the function of that vertical coincidence.

It's turned into a nasty edit war now at Inversion (music), and will soon go to mediation. Are you willing to support my line that the I 6/4 fallacy should not be privileged by being the sole illustration of the cadential 6/4, but should either be matched with another illustration or removed completely? There's been a half-hearted attempt to tip hats at the proper way of analysing it, in the main text, but I maintain that the privilege of an illustration should not be confined to one side. Tony 03:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * However, I have no software with which to create such an illustration. I think it's improper that the POV should remain privileged in an illustration until it is sorted out. Tony 15:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, that would be very nice of you! I can easily tweak the text (a mention of both, with a footnote explaining each approach?). Tony 00:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)